Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-28 Thread Saif Abdul Cassim
Kotlin needs jdk 8 to build. On Tue, 28 May 2019, 3:13 pm John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Hi! > > On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > > as well. > > > > The changes

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 5/27/19 11:04 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > The packages are now accepted and the 8u212-b03 upstream version is now > uploaded > as well. > > The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, > sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, pleas

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Mon, 27 May 2019, Matthias Klose wrote: > The changes and buildinfo files didn't exist anymore for the powerpc, ppc64, > sparc64 and x32 binaries, so if a porter wants to restore those, please > rebuild > them with manually installed openjdk-8 packages from snapshot.debian.org. Will do for x3

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 26.05.19 21:13, Matthias Klose wrote: > The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable > (although > the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again > in > NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecting to the upload > to u

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-27 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 09:13:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable > (although > the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again > in > NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecti

Re: openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 26/05/2019 à 21:13, Matthias Klose a écrit : > The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable > (although > the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again > in > NEW, targeting unstable. Thank you for the upload Matthias. > I honestly do

openjdk-8 re-uploaded to unstable (currently in NEW)

2019-05-26 Thread Matthias Klose
The openjdk-8 packages which were unfortunately removed from unstable (although the issue #915620 only asked for the removal of some binaries), are now again in NEW, targeting unstable. One of the FTP assistants is objecting to the upload to unstable, apparently because somebody (security team, Mo