Le 04/05/2014 00:15, tony mancill a écrit :
> That was it - thanks for the tip. openjdk-8 builds correctly in a
> jessie chroot.
The issue is now fixed if you want to give it another try.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Le 04/05/2014 00:15, tony mancill a écrit :
> That was it - thanks for the tip. openjdk-8 builds correctly in a
> jessie chroot.
I figured what is wrong, you can work around this issue by ensuring the
letter 'j' doesn't appear in the build path.
There a script invoked during the hotspot build t
On 05/03/2014 12:15 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 03/05/2014 20:00, tony mancill a écrit :
>>
>> I'm having problems building. The patches apply correctly and langtools
>> builds, but hotspot fails very early on in the ad_stuff target with an
>> error about make arguments, which I will paste belo
Le 03/05/2014 20:00, tony mancill a écrit :
>
> I'm having problems building. The patches apply correctly and langtools
> builds, but hotspot fails very early on in the ad_stuff target with an
> error about make arguments, which I will paste below. Any suggestions?
> I've pulled the current sou
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:36:59PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, it was something obvious as I suspected.
>> My build just started, let's see how it goes for me. :)
>>
>
> I was able to rebuild it and to use it to rebuild some other packages.
I'm having problems building. The p
On 05/02/2014 02:56 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 02/05/2014 16:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>
>> And there are a few build dependencies left on openjdk-6-jdk:
>>
>> - java-access-bridge
>
> I'm unable to find any dependency left on libaccess-bridge-java (there
> is just a suggested dependency o
Le 02/05/2014 22:25, Felix Natter a écrit :
> Thus, after extracting openjdk-8_8u5-b13.orig.tar.gz in . (the directory
> containing 'debian'), I had to move its contents (two tarballs) from
> ./openjdk8 to . [1]
> --> maybe this should be mentioned in README.source?
I didn't document this step b
Le 02/05/2014 16:18, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> And there are a few build dependencies left on openjdk-6-jdk:
>
> - java-access-bridge
I'm unable to find any dependency left on libaccess-bridge-java (there
is just a suggested dependency on libaccess-bridge-java-jni from
omegat). java-access-brid
Emmanuel Bourg writes:
> Hi Felix,
hello Emmanuel,
> Thank you for giving a try.
>
> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
>
>> I am having a small issue with the current git version:
>> If I download via "debian/rules get-orig-source", and then
>> "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" I get:
>>
>
Le 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter a écrit :
> Does that mean that you intend to ship openjdk-7 xor openjdk-8 in
> jessie? I think it would be good to keep openjdk-7 in case there are
> problems (like rendering problems [1]) with openjdk-8.
openjdk-8 build depends on openjdk-7 so it can't go away
On 02/05/2014 20:18, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> BTW: my package jmapviewer still Depends: on openjdk-7-jre. This should
> soon be changed to default-jre, right? (I _think_ David wants to package
> 1.03 anyway...).
>
Right!
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
Matthias Klose writes:
> Am 02.05.2014 06:36, schrieb tony mancill:
>> On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
>>
Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives"
to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and r
Le 02/05/2014 15:11, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> The first priority should be to ship with only one version of OpenJDK.
I have just fixed visualvm which was one of the remaining packages
depending on openjdk-6. We are down to two bugs preventing the removal:
https://bugs.debian.org/727805 (rjav
Am 02.05.2014 06:36, schrieb tony mancill:
> On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
>
>>> Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives"
>>> to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages
>>> (tha
On 02/05/2014 08:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
>
>> Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the
>> deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target
>> uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on ope
Le 02/05/2014 06:36, tony mancill a écrit :
> Given that we're 6 months from the freeze, and just 4 months from the
> deadline for any new transitions [1], is it reasonable to target
> uploading a new java-common to experimental that depends on openjdk-8 in
> the next month or so?
Why not, but wi
On 05/01/2014 10:05 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
>> Another question: Is it sufficient to point "update-java-alternatives"
>> to openjdk-8 in order to use it to build and run subsequent packages
>> (that build-depend on default-jdk and depend on default-j
Hi Felix,
Thank you for giving a try.
Le 01/05/2014 18:27, Felix Natter a écrit :
> I am having a small issue with the current git version:
> If I download via "debian/rules get-orig-source", and then
> "dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc" I get:
>
> Extracting the sources...
> tar -xf jdk8u-*.tar.xz
>
Emmanuel Bourg writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have completed the first steps to package OpenJDK 8 and it's now
> possible to play with the package. I have uploaded amd64 binaries for
> those interested in testing this quickly:
>
> http://87.98.165.193/debian
>
> The source package is available on al
I also think that having OpenJDK 8 as the default would be preferable.
However fixing 80+ FTBFS bugs in time might be quite of a feat depending
on the type of the problem. I suggest to file bug reports for all those
bugs first. Severity important seems to be reasonable at the beginning.
If it turns
On 09/04/2014 05:55, tony mancill wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 05:40 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on
>>> track to provide a proper package.
>> Agree.
>>
>>> The question o
Le 10/04/2014 14:23, Eugene Zhukov a écrit :
.
> Isn't JavaFX supposed to be part of JDK 8?
JavaFX is part of Java 8, but not part of OpenJDK 8. It's under a
different upstream repository:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8/master/rt/file/
We will probably have to package it separately.
Emman
Hello,
I cloned OpenJDK 8 repo from [0], downloaded source with
get-orig-source, built and installed the binaries.
Then I tried to compile (switched to new javac before, of course)
JavaFX "Hello World" application. Compilation fails with package
javafx.* does not exist...
Isn't JavaFX supposed to
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:55 AM, tony mancill wrote:
> My initial thought was that jessie would use OpenJDK 7. However, given
> that the jessie freeze is in early November of 2014 [0], and that Oracle
> has (tentatively?) announced EOL for Java7 in April of 2015 [1], OpenJDK
> 8 seems like it mig
On 04/08/2014 05:40 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>
>> OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on
>> track to provide a proper package.
>
> Agree.
>
>> The question of the default-jdk is open for discussion. F
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 06:36:59PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> Thanks, it was something obvious as I suspected.
> My build just started, let's see how it goes for me. :)
>
I was able to rebuild it and to use it to rebuild some other packages.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
se
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are now on
> track to provide a proper package.
Agree.
> The question of the default-jdk is open for discussion. Fedora 21 will
> default to OpenJDK 8 and I wish we could
Le 08/04/2014 23:36, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> Side question: What are our plans (as debian-java team) regarding
> openjdk-8 for jessie? openjdk-7 is going to be our default-jdk but do we
> plan to provide openjdk-8 as preview, right?
OpenJDK 8 in Jessie is a must-have in my opinion, and we are
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:22:07PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Thank you for the hint, I forgot to set the QUILT_PATCHES variable in
> debian/rules. You should have QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches in
> ~/.quiltrc, this allowed me to build the package with debuild. With the
> fixed debian/rules i
Le 08/04/2014 20:04, Miguel Landaeta a écrit :
> I was playing with your openjdk-8 (thanks for packaging it!) package
> but I think I'm missing something obvius regarding quilt or something
> with the patch management system.
Thank you for the hint, I forgot to set the QUILT_PATCHES variable in
d
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:56:37AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> The source package is available on alioth, instructions to download the
> upstream tarball are in debian/README.source:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/openjdk-8.git
>
Hi Emmanuel,
I was playing with your op
Hi all,
I have completed the first steps to package OpenJDK 8 and it's now
possible to play with the package. I have uploaded amd64 binaries for
those interested in testing this quickly:
http://87.98.165.193/debian
The source package is available on alioth, instructions to download the
upstr
32 matches
Mail list logo
