Re: openjdk-6 segfaults and gcc-4.6.1 failures

2011-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08/04/2011 02:34 PM, Tom Marble wrote: > On 08/04/2011 02:41 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> which architectures? > Attempting to build on amd64. > >> which versions? > I used openjdk-6 6b18-1.8.9-0.1 for bootstrapping, but I'm quite > interested in your opinion of how far we should have openjdk-6

Re: openjdk-6 segfaults and gcc-4.6.1 failures

2011-08-04 Thread Tom Marble
On 08/04/2011 02:41 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > which architectures? Attempting to build on amd64. > which versions? I used openjdk-6 6b18-1.8.9-0.1 for bootstrapping, but I'm quite interested in your opinion of how far we should have openjdk-6 track upstream (IcedTea + Oracle)? > do you see addi

Re: openjdk-6 segfaults and gcc-4.6.1 failures

2011-08-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08/04/2011 05:13 AM, Tom Marble wrote: > All: > > Just a quick note for those interested in building OpenJDK > (6, 7 or 8) in unstable... > > I am now getting build failures on amd64... Some of these > seem to be related to gcc 4.6.1 (resolved by using gcc 4.5.3) > and some seem to be a new ro

openjdk-6 segfaults and gcc-4.6.1 failures

2011-08-03 Thread Tom Marble
All: Just a quick note for those interested in building OpenJDK (6, 7 or 8) in unstable... I am now getting build failures on amd64... Some of these seem to be related to gcc 4.6.1 (resolved by using gcc 4.5.3) and some seem to be a new round of segfaults in openjdk-6 6b18-1.8.9-0.1. I will cont