Add .apache2 still not works:
Restarting web server: Apache2Syntax error on line 5
of /etc/apache2/conf.d/workers2.properties:
Invalid command '[logger.apache2]', perhaps
mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the
server configuration
_
Alessandro Polverini wrote:
I'm using his package right now (why is it not in the debian archive
btw?), but it's only for apache 1.3.29, while I need mod_jk2 for
apache2.
I have rebuild and uploaded the mod_jk package now. It should be in the
Debian archives in a couple of days.
Any h
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 01:26, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Alessandro Polverini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> > anybody knows why I seems unable to find mod_jk nor mod_jk2 also in
> > unstable?
> >
> > In particular I need mod_jk2, I tried to reco
Alessandro Polverini wrote:
anybody knows why I seems unable to find mod_jk nor mod_jk2 also in
unstable?
Yes: mod_jk has been removed from the archives together with Tomcat 3.x
and I did not yet upload the new libapache-mod-jk package. A package for
the latest Apache 1.3 packages is available
Alessandro Polverini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> anybody knows why I seems unable to find mod_jk nor mod_jk2 also in
> unstable?
>
> In particular I need mod_jk2, I tried to recompile it from the sources,
> but without success :(
>
> Anybody can hel
Hello,
anybody knows why I seems unable to find mod_jk nor mod_jk2 also in
unstable?
In particular I need mod_jk2, I tried to recompile it from the sources,
but without success :(
Anybody can help me?
Thanks,
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
arta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.2-src/jk/native2/server/apache2'
make: *** [jk2-build] Error 1
I'm really stuck.
Con anyone help me having mod_jk or mod_jk2 (preferred) for apache2?
Thanks very much for any help,
Alex
P.S.: Please be kind with me, I'm relatively new to Debian with
Thomas Cataldo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 22:06, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>> Rather than using the mod-jk module, I've been using
>> ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse to pass traffic back and forth. My config
>> looks like this in the virtual server:
>>
>> ProxyPass/puburl
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
> > information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
> > found some references about libapache-mod-
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 22:06, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
> Rather than using the mod-jk module, I've been using
> ProxyPass/ProxyPassReverse to pass traffic back and forth. My config
> looks like this in the virtual server:
>
> ProxyPass/puburl/ http://locahost:8080/tomcaturl/
> ProxyPassRevers
woody, but this package has been removed from testing and unstable at my
request. This means that only tomcat4 is available there.
I have cerated a new source package for mod_jk. It has not yet been
uploaded to the official Debian archive but can be downloaded from
http://people.debian.org/~sgybas
Mariano García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
> information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
> found some references about libapache-mod-jk debian package.
Rather than using the mod-jk module,
if I do a 'apt-cache search libapache-mod-jk' I don't get any
> result. What is the mod-jk package name on debian? I have tried it on a
> testing and unstable debian.
I believe mod_jk is obsolete. The current Apache/Tomcat connector in
unstable is libapache2-mod-webapp.
--
> >
> libapache-mod-jk is only in stable, it must have been replaced.
> I don't know anything about tomcat, but if you do 'apt-cache search
> apache tomcat' you'll get only a few results, and your pick should be
> among those.
AFAIK mod_jk is only i
Hi,
But if I do a 'apt-cache search libapache-mod-jk' I don't get any
result. What is the mod-jk package name on debian? I have tried it on a
testing and unstable debian.
libapache-mod-jk is only in stable, it must have been replaced.
I don't know anything about tomcat, but if you do 'apt-cache
Hi all,
I am installing tomcat with apache on Debian (testing). Looking for
information I have found that I need mod-jk apache module, and I have
found some references about libapache-mod-jk debian package.
But if I do a 'apt-cache search libapache-mod-jk' I don't get any
result. What is the mod-
Matt Price wrote:
you'll noticew that the Include line is ocmmented out -- for me, that
line didn't do anything, I guess because mod_jk.conf is EMPTY.
mod_jk.conf is only generated by Tomcat 3.x (Debian package tomcat), not
by Tomcat 4.x (Debian package tomcat4). But this feature will also be
rem
Matt Price wrote:
you'll noticew that the Include line is ocmmented out -- for me, that
line didn't do anything, I guess because mod_jk.conf is EMPTY.
mod_jk.conf is only generated by Tomcat 3.x (Debian package tomcat), not
by Tomcat 4.x (Debian package tomcat4). But this feature will also be
I have to say, I don't really understand this mod_jk stuff. I've read
all the available documentation I can find, but none of it resolves my
issue. Currently I've managed to make my application work just fine
using manual ocnfig of Apache -- so in addition to the LoadModule
I have to say, I don't really understand this mod_jk stuff. I've read
all the available documentation I can find, but none of it resolves my
issue. Currently I've managed to make my application work just fine
using manual ocnfig of Apache -- so in addition to the LoadModule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 Oct 2002 8:31 pm, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> > all, even if you install mod_jk. You
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
> apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncomme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 Oct 2002 8:31 pm, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> > all, even if you install mod_jk. You
e to get this projectm
> oving forward. thanks loads,
> matt
Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at all,
even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the apache
website for how to do this.
Tom
- --
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Jabbe
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote:
> Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at
> all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the
> apache website for how to do this.
Huh? What is necessary beyond uncomme
e to get this projectm
> oving forward. thanks loads,
> matt
Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at all,
even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the apache
website for how to do this.
Tom
- --
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Jabbe
Hi there,
I hope this is the right list -- let me know if I should be sending
this to debian-user.
I have an instance of Tomcat 4.0.4 (the testing package) running on my
almost-all-woody machine. On its own tomcat seems to work fine, but as
far as I can make out it doesn't interact at all with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 7:58 am, jef wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2
> version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app.
I couldnt get mod_webapp to work properl
Hi,
I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2
version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app.
Thanks,
jef
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 7:58 am, jef wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2
> version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app.
I couldnt get mod_webapp to work properl
Hi,
I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2
version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app.
Thanks,
jef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> LoadModule jk_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so
>
> # The following line is for apacheconfig - DO NOT REMOVE!
> JkWorkersFile /etc/tomcat/jk/workers.properties
> Include /etc/tomcat/auto/mod_jk.conf
>
this finally seems to work.
Now I can avoid using a static file :-)
ThanX
mfg Soeren
> LoadModule jk_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so
>
> # The following line is for apacheconfig - DO NOT REMOVE!
> JkWorkersFile /etc/tomcat/jk/workers.properties
> Include /etc/tomcat/auto/mod_jk.conf
>
this finally seems to work.
Now I can avoid using a static file :-)
ThanX
mfg Soeren
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:52AM +0100, Soeren Kalesse wrote:
>
>
I think that only works with Tomcat 3.3. The docs for 3.2 are wrong.
Tomcat 3.2 will just ignore that line and generate it's usual
mod_jk.conf-audo with '/libexec'. Either upgrade to 3.3 or
hand-maintain your own mod_jk.conf fi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:52AM +0100, Soeren Kalesse wrote:
>
>
I think that only works with Tomcat 3.3. The docs for 3.2 are wrong.
Tomcat 3.2 will just ignore that line and generate it's usual
mod_jk.conf-audo with '/libexec'. Either upgrade to 3.3 or
hand-maintain your own mod_jk.conf f
Soeren Kalesse wrote:
Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto:
Cannot load /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
/etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so: cannot open shared object file: No
such file or directory
You should not just put a single include directive in yo
Soeren Kalesse wrote:
> Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto:
> Cannot load /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so into server:
> /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so: cannot open shared object file: No
> such file or directory
You should not just put a single include dire
> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
> Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
>
> Hmm... I only have the latter file.
well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/
The default directory in tomcat's config is
libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong.
That
> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
> Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
>
> Hmm... I only have the latter file.
well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/
The default directory in tomcat's config is
libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong.
Tha
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of
Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
Hmm... I only have the latter file.
Soeren> It also s
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of
Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
Hmm... I only have the latter file.
Soeren> It also
hello,
I installed mod_jk to make Apache work together with Tomcat.
Since I have woody I got Tomcat 3.2.
I put
Include /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto
into my http.conf to let tomcat configure the Apache
things on startup since this is recommended.
Now I'm wondering how
hello,
I installed mod_jk to make Apache work together with Tomcat.
Since I have woody I got Tomcat 3.2.
I put
Include /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto
into my http.conf to let tomcat configure the Apache
things on startup since this is recommended.
Now I'm wondering how
43 matches
Mail list logo
