W liście z wto, 01-10-2002, godz. 13:45, Stefan Gybas pisze:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
It's really not sure (unfortunatelly) if we can use kaffe
with Apache-licensed code. As FSF states it - we can'
W liście z wto, 01-10-2002, godz. 13:45, Stefan Gybas pisze:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
It's really not sure (unfortunatelly) if we can use kaffe
with Apache-licensed code. As FSF states it - we can
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:07:05PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:01:56PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
>
> > What about splitting those libs into lib*-java and lib*-doc ? The former
> > would then go into main, and the doc into contrib?
>
> Yes, that would be the way to
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:07:05PM +0200, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:01:56PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
>
> > What about splitting those libs into lib*-java and lib*-doc ? The former
> > would then go into main, and the doc into contrib?
>
> Yes, that would be the way t
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:01:56PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> What about splitting those libs into lib*-java and lib*-doc ? The former
> would then go into main, and the doc into contrib?
Yes, that would be the way to go if there's no free javadoc but this means
additional work for the main
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 13:45, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
>
> I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
> the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the o
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> [Ant, Xalan2]
> Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the optional classes in
ant-optional.jar do not, so I was thinking ab
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Xavier Renard wrote:
> What about xerces in this case? It already provides DOM,SAX,JAXP but not
> Trax which comes with xml-apis.jar apparently.
That's true but I don't see a problem with this. Even if both JARs are
in the class path everything should wo
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Gybas wrote:
IIRC lib-sax-java only contained the SAX 1 interface classes. So if
you want the SAX API in a seperate package you should support SAX
version 2 (which is compatible with version 1).
As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar (which is
created by Xala
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:01:56PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
> What about splitting those libs into lib*-java and lib*-doc ? The former
> would then go into main, and the doc into contrib?
Yes, that would be the way to go if there's no free javadoc but this means
additional work for the mai
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 13:45, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > [Ant, Xalan2]
> > Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
>
> I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
> the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:25:05AM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> [Ant, Xalan2]
> Do these classes work with gjc/kaffe?
I've done some tests with Ant and at least the core classes (i.e.
the ones in ant.jar) worked fine. Most of the optional classes in
ant-optional.jar do not, so I was thinking a
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Xavier Renard wrote:
> What about xerces in this case? It already provides DOM,SAX,JAXP but not
> Trax which comes with xml-apis.jar apparently.
That's true but I don't see a problem with this. Even if both JARs are
in the class path everything should w
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> IIRC lib-sax-java only contained the SAX 1 interface classes. So if
> you want the SAX API in a seperate package you should support SAX
> version 2 (which is compatible with version 1).
>
> As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar (which is
>
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar
Stefan> (which is created by Xalan2) into a seperate package. But
Stefan> I'd like to move some Java packages to main first
Stefan> (including Ant and Xalan2)
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> As I've already told, I'm planning to split xml-apis.jar
Stefan> (which is created by Xalan2) into a seperate package. But
Stefan> I'd like to move some Java packages to main first
Stefan> (including Ant and Xalan2)
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xml-apis.jar contains DOM level 2, SAX version 2, JAXP 1.1 and TRaX.
> It's only about 100 KB so I don't think it makes sense to split each
> API into its own package. I can create sysmlinks (sax.jar, dom.jar,
> jaxp.jar and trax.jar) to xml-apis.jar if th
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xml-apis.jar contains DOM level 2, SAX version 2, JAXP 1.1 and TRaX.
> It's only about 100 KB so I don't think it makes sense to split each
> API into its own package. I can create sysmlinks (sax.jar, dom.jar,
> jaxp.jar and trax.jar) to xml-apis.jar if t
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
If you want the lib-sax-java package I can upload it again. I just
thought that it was superseeded by xalan or xerces (did not remember
which one now). That is why I asked for its removal (no packages
depend on it).
IIRC lib-sax-java only contained the SAX 1 interface classes.
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> If you want the lib-sax-java package I can upload it again. I just
> thought that it was superseeded by xalan or xerces (did not remember
> which one now). That is why I asked for its removal (no packages
> depend on it).
IIRC lib-sax-java only contained the SAX 1 interfac
20 matches
Mail list logo
