On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:41:49AM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > > Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you
> > > please also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
> >
> > It should only be provided if it contains the java runtime (like
> > classes.zip or
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:36:57PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> (CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.)
>
> Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please
> also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
It should only be prov
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:41:49AM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > > Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you
> > > please also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
> >
> > It should only be provided if it contains the java runtime (like
> > classes.zip o
On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 03:36:57PM -0600, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> (CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.)
>
> Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please
> also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
It should only be pro
(CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.)
Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please
also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
Also it would be nice to provide an alternative for /usr/bin/java, since a
number of java p
(CCed to debian-java because it relates to the kaffe/testing thread.)
Hi. If libgcj2 is going to provide java-virtual-machine, could you please
also provide java1-runtime (as per proposed java policy)?
Also it would be nice to provide an alternative for /usr/bin/java, since a
number of java
6 matches
Mail list logo