Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-06 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: jmp in testing > Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:26:19 +0200 >>> OpenSourcing Java? :-D > > I tried compiling jmp with kaffe but failed:( Maybe you can send the

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-06 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: jmp in testing Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:26:19 +0200 >> OpenSourcing Java? :-D I tried compiling jmp with kaffe but failed:( > Maybe they are shorter-term solutions, like j2re1.4-dummy? It's java-virtual-machine-dummy.

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-06 Thread Daniel Bonniot
OpenSourcing Java? :-D Maybe they are shorter-term solutions, like j2re1.4-dummy? I know there is a way to generate local dummy packages, but that will not help packages migrating into testing... Daniel

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A remaining problem is that no package provides j2re1.4 | > java2-runtime. Can we do something about this? OpenSourcing Java? :-D -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- pgp0o60VJVhPB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-05 Thread Daniel Bonniot
#231818. Takashi just downgraded it from serious to normal. Why hasn't the changelog closed it? This bug is for m68k and jmp couldn't be builded. As FTBFS shouldn't be RC bug for contrib package, I just changed bug status. Should I close it? The bug was that jmp needs a sdk to build, and did not

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
> From: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: jmp in testing > Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:23:42 +0200 >> #231818. Takashi just downgraded it from serious to normal. Why hasn't the >> changelog closed it? > > This bug is for m68k and jmp couldn&

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-03 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: jmp in testing Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:23:42 +0200 > #231818. Takashi just downgraded it from serious to normal. Why hasn't > the changelog closed it? This bug is for m68k and jmp couldn't be builded. As FTBFS s

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-02 Thread Daniel Bonniot
First, there is this RC bug. It should have been closed by Takashi's last upload, but it somehow didn't happen. Anybody understands this? Which one? I see a manpage problem and a j2sdk dep missing but no RC bug. (maybe it's been closed?) #231818. Takashi just downgraded it from serious to normal.

Re: jmp in testing

2004-08-02 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Daniel Bonniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I would be happy to see jmp in testing/sarge. Here is the package page: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jmp.html > > First, there is this RC bug. It should have been closed by Takashi's > last upload, but i

jmp in testing

2004-08-02 Thread Daniel Bonniot
Hi, I would be happy to see jmp in testing/sarge. Here is the package page: http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jmp.html First, there is this RC bug. It should have been closed by Takashi's last upload, but it somehow didn't happen. Anybody understands this? Then there is the power