Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-bridger
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Red Hat Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/dmlloyd/bridger
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java Bridge Method
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-threads
Version : 2.3.0
Upstream Author : Red Hat Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-threads
* License : Apache-2.0 and LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org
* Package name: jboss-jdeparser2
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jdeparser/jdeparser2
* License : Apache-2.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-java@lists.debian.org
* Package name: jboss-logging-tools
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : http://www.jboss.org/quickstarts/eap/logging-tools/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-xnio
Version : 3.3.2
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : http://xnio.jboss.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : simplified low-level I/O layer
Thank you for the hard work Markus.
Le 12/05/2015 23:12, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> I had to take a break from bnd and finished jboss-logging instead. The
> package compiles now but an update of apache-log4j2 and a new
> build-dependency, jackson-dataformat-xml, were required to finis
Hi all,
I had to take a break from bnd and finished jboss-logging instead. The
package compiles now but an update of apache-log4j2 and a new
build-dependency, jackson-dataformat-xml, were required to finish the job.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/jackson-dataformat-xml.git/
I could
On 30.04.2015 18:13, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 30.04.2015 18:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Thank you Markus, I just uploaded them and they are now in the NEW queue.
>>
>
> Thank you. I'll take care of jboss-logging at the weekend and get back
> to you.
I have uploa
On 30.04.2015 18:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Thank you Markus, I just uploaded them and they are now in the NEW queue.
>
Thank you. I'll take care of jboss-logging at the weekend and get back
to you.
Cheers,
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Thank you Markus, I just uploaded them and they are now in the NEW queue.
Emmanuel
Le 27/04/2015 16:38, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> it seems I missed your message on IRC.
>
> jboss-logmanager is ready but you also need jboss-modules to compile it.
>
Hi Emmanuel,
it seems I missed your message on IRC.
jboss-logmanager is ready but you also need jboss-modules to compile it.
I've finished both packages a while ago but I wanted to wait and see if
the effort to package Syncany was really serious before I would ask for
sponsorship. If you
On 02.03.2015 22:04, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-modules
> Version : 1.4.1.Final
> Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss-modules/j
On 02.03.2015 22:04, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-modules
> Version : 1.4.1.Final
> Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss-modules/j
On 02.03.2015 18:06, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-logmanager
> Version : 1.5.4.Final
> Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss-
On 02.03.2015 17:55, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Markus Koschany
>
> * Package name: jboss-classfilewriter
> Version : 1.0.5.Final
> Upstream Author : Stuart Douglas
> * URL : https://github.com/jboss
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-modules
Version : 1.4.1.Final
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jboss-modules/jboss-modules
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-logmanager
Version : 1.5.4.Final
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/jboss-logging/jboss-logmanager
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Markus Koschany
* Package name: jboss-classfilewriter
Version : 1.0.5.Final
Upstream Author : Stuart Douglas
* URL : https://github.com/jbossas/jboss-classfilewriter
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Hi Victor,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Victor Seva
wrote:
> is this effort still alive?
not really.
> is there anybody interested in get jboss packaged in Debian?
Yes, it is far from trivial.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hello
On Wed Oct 20 10:02:15 UTC 2010 James Page wrote:
>I'm currently reviewing potential JEE application stacks for discussion
>at UDS-N next week. I would be really like to understand the current
>state of JBoss packaging in Debian in a bit more detail. I've read
>
used standard I could do something useful to others.
One of the applications I want to integrate is JBoss AS. I therefore
analysed the existing Debian jbossas4 package as well as the upstream
JBoss AS build process. There still seems to be quite some work to be
done to make JBoss working on Debi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:33:49PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to fix FTBFS for jboss related packages in Ubuntu. But I
> have found out that there are circular build dependencies. Since there
> has been no change in source in Ubuntu, I thought I would be
Hi all,
I am trying to fix FTBFS for jboss related packages in Ubuntu. But I
have found out that there are circular build dependencies. Since there
has been no change in source in Ubuntu, I thought I would better ask
here.
Are the circular build dependencies intentional or accidental? If they
Hello out there,
I'm trying to start JBoss over the Eclipse IDE. The problem is, I
installed jboss with this instruction:
http://www.debian-administration.org/users/andershedstrom/weblog/2
Not necessary to say that I use Eclipse as a normal user with a
X-Session. The problem now is that I ha
Hi,
I updated alioth SVN to build with JBoss 4.0.4. Build instructions are
at:
http://wiki.debian.org/JBossPackaging
It still is as crappy as it was: needs non-free JDK and doesn't rely
on already packaged third party stuff. Help in fixing this would be
welcome.
Cheers,
-- Guido
signatur
party jars. Then if someone finds time could package one without
> >>having to look through the jboss stuff. I would like to see a wiki
> >>page for dependencies of the interested packages (not only for jboss
> >>but also for other programs)
> >
> > Which Wiki w
[Guido Guenther]
> Which Wiki would be appropriate?
I assume http://wiki.debian.org/Java> would be a good choice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
>
>>For a) It would be helpful if you could provide a list of the needed
>>3rd party jars. Then if someone finds time could package one without
>>having to look throu
Hi Wolfgang,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 07:30:20PM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> For a) It would be helpful if you could provide a list of the needed
> 3rd party jars. Then if someone finds time could package one without
> having to look through the jboss stuff. I would like to see a wiki
&
Hi Guido,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> Hi Torsten,
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
>
>>Does anyone know of or is working on packaging recent versions of the JBoss
>>application server for Debian?
>
> Have a look at:
> http://svn.deb
Hi Torsten,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:49:00PM +0100, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Does anyone know of or is working on packaging recent versions of the JBoss
> application server for Debian?
Have a look at:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-jboss
this allows for easy building of Jboss4
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:49 +0100, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone know of or is working on packaging recent versions of the JBoss
> application server for Debian?
I am using JBoss 4.0.x on Debian with the Sun JVM. Not as a Debian
package, but I just installed it in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone know of or is working on packaging recent versions of the JBoss
> application server for Debian?
I met some people at Oldenburg in september/october they told me they
were working on it b
Hi!
Does anyone know of or is working on packaging recent versions of the JBoss
application server for Debian?
Regards,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I had exactly the same problem and it works now with method described
below (Thx Stefan). If I restart apache now, i get the following lines
(I've cutted in every line the date out):
atpdeblap:~# /etc/init.d/apache2 start
Starting web server: Apache2[Thu Jul 29 17:38:06 2004] [notice]
config.
Oh, yes, It's ok now. Thank you.
--- Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 的正文：>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Restarting web server: Apache2Syntax error on
> line 5
> > of /etc/apache2/conf.d/work ers2.properties:
> > Invalid command '[logger]', perhaps mis-spelled
> or
> > defined by a module n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Restarting web server: Apache2Syntax error on line 5
> of /etc/apache2/conf.d/work ers2.properties:
> Invalid command '[logger]', perhaps mis-spelled or
> defined by a module not inclu ded in the server
> configuration
workers2.properties is not a configuration file snipp
Add .apache2 still not works:
Restarting web server: Apache2Syntax error on line 5
of /etc/apache2/conf.d/workers2.properties:
Invalid command '[logger.apache2]', perhaps
mis-spelled or defined by a module not included in the
server configuration
_
Le jeudi 1 Juillet 2004 17:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ÃcritÂ:
> [logger]
> info=Native logger
> level=ERROR
try to use :
[logger.apache2]
level=ERROR
> I tried to download mod_jk2.so from apache.org, and
> recover the file in /usr/lib/apache2/modules,
> But it still not work.
Generaly a bad idea to
Hi,
I just want to connect tomcat4 and apache2.
So I can use http://localhost/examples to visit
tomcat4 examples.
I still meet the problem:
Restarting web server: Apache2Syntax error on line 5
of /etc/apache2/conf.d/work ers2.properties:
Invalid command '[logger]', perh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
> intentions of doing 3.1+. I found it quite a bit of work to do the
> packaging alone and deal with all the dependencies
On 10 Mar 2004, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
> >
> > i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> > apt-get source for them already, at least
>
> I packaged an old version of jboss
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 11:39, elijah wright wrote:
>
> i'm pretty sure someone already built jboss packages - i seem to have an
> apt-get source for them already, at least
I packaged an old version of jboss (3.0.2 or something)[1] and had
intentions of doing 3.1+. I found it
Hi,
I have applied the steps at this URL http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2003/debian-java-200308/msg00133.html.
after completion of all steps there was no error but i did not get mod_jk2.so file. I tried
“Make” command instead of “make
-f Makefile.apxs” command .
I got his error
We have been working for a while with J2SDK1.4.2 +
JBoss + Jetty/Tomcat + Apache 2.0.x, and we seem to
keep coming up across the same problem regarding the re-
compiling of mod_jk2 for work with these systems (to
bind apache + tomcat/jetty for request).
Not sure if this will be helpful, but
We have been working for a while with J2SDK1.4.2 +
JBoss + Jetty/Tomcat + Apache 2.0.x, and we seem to
keep coming up across the same problem regarding the re-
compiling of mod_jk2 for work with these systems (to
bind apache + tomcat/jetty for request).
Not sure if this will be helpful, but
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
> .debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
I tried them at some point and found that the regular JBoss
installation package
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
.debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially
tomcat4?
Thanks!
Jerry Haltom
Feedback Plus, Inc.
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
> .debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
I tried them at some point and found that the regular JBoss
installation package
I had heard from the grapevine that somebody had put together some JBoss
.debs? Are these "release quality" (do they work?) Where can I get them?
How do they integrate with existing debian packages, specifially
tomcat4?
Thanks!
Jerry Haltom
Feedback Plus, Inc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Quoting Steffan Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Not sure whether this is related to your problem, but on an i386 box I
> had to use an SDK version >= 1.4 in order to run tomcat 4.1.24
> properly. Perhaps, this also applies to jboss? AFAIK, there are binary
> 1.4.1 pack
I found the J2SDK1.4 for sparc, but It's in "01" version. (You can read
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq) clik on one of the mirror
site http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html.
get /JDK-1.4.1/sparc/01/j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-sparc-gcc3.2.bin
jboss-3.2.1_t
Not sure whether this is related to your problem, but on an i386 box I
had to use an SDK version >= 1.4 in order to run tomcat 4.1.24
properly. Perhaps, this also applies to jboss? AFAIK, there are binary
1.4.1 packages for sparc, not sure about deb's though.
Gruss
Steffan
On Wed, Jul
Quoting Steffan Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Not sure whether this is related to your problem, but on an i386 box I
> had to use an SDK version >= 1.4 in order to run tomcat 4.1.24
> properly. Perhaps, this also applies to jboss? AFAIK, there are binary
> 1.4.1 pack
I found the J2SDK1.4 for sparc, but It's in "01" version. (You can read
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq) clik on one of the mirror
site http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html.
get /JDK-1.4.1/sparc/01/j2sdk-1.4.1-01-linux-sparc-gcc3.2.bin
jboss-3.2.1_t
Hi all,
I've installed j2sdk1.3 (Java sdk) on (Linux 2.4.20 sparc64) and i try to
run application server "jboss-3.2.1_tomcat-4.1.24". Jboss halt immediately
after a exception error.
#The java version "1.3.1":
#Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (buil
Not sure whether this is related to your problem, but on an i386 box I
had to use an SDK version >= 1.4 in order to run tomcat 4.1.24
properly. Perhaps, this also applies to jboss? AFAIK, there are binary
1.4.1 packages for sparc, not sure about deb's though.
Gruss
Steffan
On Wed, Jul
Hi all,
I've installed j2sdk1.3 (Java sdk) on (Linux 2.4.20 sparc64) and i try to
run application server "jboss-3.2.1_tomcat-4.1.24". Jboss halt immediately
after a exception error.
#The java version "1.3.1":
#Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (buil
Quoting "Donsbach, Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Does JBoss require a 1.4 JDK? The Compaq one for Alpha Linux is only 1.3.
No, everything from 1.3.1 is supported, and the Compaq SDK is 1.3.1.
Florian
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Donsbach
> Hewlett Packard C
Does anybody have experiences with running applications on the Compaq SDK (from
http://h18012.www1.hp.com/java/download/linux/1.3.1/index.html) on an Alpha
system? Basically Java is working, many applications we tested do run (including
Tomcat, Swing GUIs and JBoss 2.4.x), but when we start JBoss
I don't think any of the free Javas (or actually Classpath.org's
Classpath) is up to handling JBoss' esoteric use of Proxies,
Classloaders or garbage handling. I could be wrong, but that is my
impression. Heck, I'd be excited about Tomcat 4.0.
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 10:39, Al
Actually I ended up grabbing modjk2 from the Apache site and dropping
that straight into the modules directory. That worked fine...
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
___
/ Andrew Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm trying to setup Jboss w
___
/ Andrew Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm trying to setup Jboss with Apache2 but I'm struggling with the
| jk2 connector. The Apache2 install was done using apt-get while the
| Jboss ( jboss-3.0.6_tomcat-4.1.18) in
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Jboss with Apache2 but I'm struggling with the jk2
connector. The Apache2 install was done using apt-get while the Jboss (
jboss-3.0.6_tomcat-4.1.18) install was just a case of unzipping a
binary. As it stands both Apache2 and Jboss start and run perfectly.
T
Hi,
I'm trying to setup Jboss with Apache2 but I'm struggling with the jk2
connector. The Apache2 install was done using apt-get while the Jboss (
jboss-3.0.6_tomcat-4.1.18) install was just a case of unzipping a
binary. As it stands both Apache2 and Jboss start and run perfectly.
T
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:30, Mark Devin wrote:
> I have played with Tomcat and J2ee and have deployed some basic
> applications. However, I have never installed JBoss.
>
> I would prefer to use the Debian package management system to take care
> of future security and bug fixes.
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 19:30, Mark Devin wrote:
> I have played with Tomcat and J2ee and have deployed some basic
> applications. However, I have never installed JBoss.
>
> I would prefer to use the Debian package management system to take care
> of future security and bug fixes.
I have played with Tomcat and J2ee and have deployed some basic
applications. However, I have never installed JBoss.
I would prefer to use the Debian package management system to take care
of future security and bug fixes.
I tried to find the jboss packages at innovationsw.com that Joe Phillips
I have played with Tomcat and J2ee and have deployed some basic
applications. However, I have never installed JBoss.
I would prefer to use the Debian package management system to take care
of future security and bug fixes.
I tried to find the jboss packages at innovationsw.com that Joe Phillips
or > a debconf dialog.
>>
>> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at
>> standard locations that java debs(from blackdown, maybe
>> /usr/local) contain.
Joe> this, along with debconf are planned for future releases.
Two things: why
or > a debconf dialog.
>>
>> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at
>> standard locations that java debs(from blackdown, maybe
>> /usr/local) contain.
Joe> this, along with debconf are planned for future releases.
Two things: why
> > /var/lib/jboss/
> what's this for? I guess I'll find out when I poke through your
> packages (later this week).
/var/lib/jboss/deploy/, which is where deployments occur. It was g+ws jboss,
and update-jboss(a helper script) had --deploy and --undeploy cmds for users
to run as non-root.
> I think we should work to package each individually (eg. javamail) if
> possible and they fall into the above case. The jboss-contrib package
> would shrink over time. The problem with this approach is that future
> versions of jboss-contrib won't be backward compatible with e
> > /var/lib/jboss/
> what's this for? I guess I'll find out when I poke through your
> packages (later this week).
/var/lib/jboss/deploy/, which is where deployments occur. It was g+ws jboss,
and update-jboss(a helper script) had --deploy and --undeploy cmds for us
> I think we should work to package each individually (eg. javamail) if
> possible and they fall into the above case. The jboss-contrib package
> would shrink over time. The problem with this approach is that future
> versions of jboss-contrib won't be backward compatible with e
Adam Heath wrote:
jboss debs on jboss-web-container, a virtual package
jboss-jetty(does not exist) and jboss-catalina provide jboss-web-container.
That's how my 2.4 packages worked. I even made a test jboss-jetty, and even
had *both* deployed at once(I used alternatives to select the defaul
Joe Phillips wrote:
I know I know, that was *only* in the name of expediency in getting *a*
package. Future packages *will* be built from source, at least my 3.2+
packages will - I'm still debating on a 3.0.5 package.
3.0.5 is well broken - go for either 3.0 head or wait a week for 3.0.6
3.2 is s
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> > a debconf dialog.
>
> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locatio
Adam Heath wrote:
jboss debs on jboss-web-container, a virtual package
jboss-jetty(does not exist) and jboss-catalina provide jboss-web-container.
That's how my 2.4 packages worked. I even made a test jboss-jetty, and even
had *both* deployed at once(I used alternatives to select the de
Joe Phillips wrote:
I know I know, that was *only* in the name of expediency in getting *a*
package. Future packages *will* be built from source, at least my 3.2+
packages will - I'm still debating on a 3.0.5 package.
3.0.5 is well broken - go for either 3.0 head or wait a week for 3.0.6
3.
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:48, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > Are you saying that the non-tomcat binary releases are
> > configured for jetty? If so, I was not aware of that. I
> > figured they were jboss without any web containers. I'll
On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by the default deployment. jboss-tomcat is
> it's own, optional package. Note that jboss-server-all and
> jboss-server-default depend on jboss-tomcat. The deployment that my
> packages install is stra
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> a debconf dialog.
Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
that java debs(from blackdown, maybe /usr/local) contain.
> + Th
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:44, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> > + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> > a debconf dialog.
>
> Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locatio
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:48, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > Are you saying that the non-tomcat binary releases are
> > configured for jetty? If so, I was not aware of that. I
> > figured they were jboss without any web containers. I'll
On 20 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by the default deployment. jboss-tomcat is
> it's own, optional package. Note that jboss-server-all and
> jboss-server-default depend on jboss-tomcat. The deployment that my
> packages install is stra
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + The setting of JAVA_HOME should be done by an auto search and/or
> a debconf dialog.
Use /etc/defaults/jboss, and if not set, have it look at standard locations
that java debs(from blackdown, maybe /usr/local) contain.
> + Th
Joe Phillips wrote:> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
debian sid system. Good work!
+ Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have already
instal
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
> debian sid system. Good work!
Great! thanks.
> + Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
> Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users wi
Joe Phillips wrote:> On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
debian sid system. Good work!
+ Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have alre
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 05:00, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>
> Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
> debian sid system. Good work!
Great! thanks.
> + Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
> Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users wi
Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
debian sid system. Good work!
But a couple of comments:
+ Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have already
installed jdk - having an extra 40MB download is a bit of
Your jboss debs for 3.0.2-2 deployed without problems on my
debian sid system. Good work!
But a couple of comments:
+ Does it really need to depend on your jdk1.4 package?
Jboss can run on 1.3 and most debian users will have already
installed jdk - having an extra 40MB download is a bit
On 19 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> Yeah...I downloaded your sources at one point. Still need to read
> through your work. My packages are completely my own mess.
>
> > Unfortunately, 3.0 was a radical change, config wise, so I haven't been able
> > to make 3.0 debs yet.
>
> Well I'd be happy
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 01:42, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > how's very soon?
> >
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> > http://debian.innovationsw.com/
> >
> > I have plans for 3.2 next.
>
> I ha
On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> how's very soon?
>
> you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> http://debian.innovationsw.com/
>
> I have plans for 3.2 next.
I have jboss debs of 2.4(upto 2.4.7). All properly split. Depends on other
java debs in debian(wher
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> + lobby the JBoss project to make any changes that may
> assist you with your packaging (not sure of how successful
> that will be).
Good fucking luck. JBoss upstream has been resistant to any suggestions on
how they package their dependants.
s.
>
> Just been trying the debs out (apt-get install jboss jboss-doc), and came
> across the following problems:
I'm glad to see interest. I'm also glad to get feedback.
I'm assuming the above are the only packages you installed (jboss and
jboss-doc) - you're defi
On 19 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
> Yeah...I downloaded your sources at one point. Still need to read
> through your work. My packages are completely my own mess.
>
> > Unfortunately, 3.0 was a radical change, config wise, so I haven't been able
> > to make 3.0 debs yet.
>
> Well I'd be happy
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 01:42, Adam Heath wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2003, Joe Phillips wrote:
>
> > how's very soon?
> >
> > you can find my packages for 3.0.2 + tomcat at
> > http://debian.innovationsw.com/
> >
> > I have plans for 3.2 next.
>
> I ha
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
