Re: java1-compiler instead java-compiler

> "Keegan" == Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Keegan> On Saturday 05 April 2003 05:58 pm, Juan Alvarez wrote: >> Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following >> packages: >> >> java-compiler java2-compiler >> >> java1-runtime java2-runtime

Re: java1-compiler instead java-compiler

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Keegan Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Saturday 05 April 2003 05:58 pm, Juan Alvarez wrote: >> Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following packages: >> >> java-compiler >> java2-compiler >> >> java1-runtime >> java2-runtime >> >> Why

Re: java1-compiler instead java-compiler

On Saturday 05 April 2003 05:58 pm, Juan Alvarez wrote: > Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following packages: > > java-compiler > java2-compiler > > java1-runtime > java2-runtime > > Why java-compiler dont be named java1-compiler? java1-compiler its > more self explanatory. This wo

Re: java1-compiler instead java-compiler

Hello What do people say about this. I do not remember the reasons for this right now. Regards, // Ola On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:58:12PM -0500, Juan Alvarez wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following packages: > > ja

java1-compiler instead java-compiler

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following packages: java-compiler java2-compiler java1-runtime java2-runtime Why java-compiler dont be named java1-compiler? java1-compiler its more self explanatory. - -- Juan Alvarez, Fluidsignal Gr

java1-compiler instead java-compiler

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Looking to the debian meta-packages, I show the following packages: java-compiler java2-compiler java1-runtime java2-runtime Why java-compiler dont be named java1-compiler? java1-compiler its more self explanatory. - -- Juan Alvarez, Fluidsignal Gr