Re: java-common and registry

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:25:34PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives. > Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be > possible to include the registry stuff along with it? Well it is a possibility. The

Re: java-common and registry

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:25:34PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives. > Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be > possible to include the registry stuff along with it? Well it is a possibility. Th

java-common and registry

Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives. Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be possible to include the registry stuff along with it? *flutters eyelids* I can write drafts for the appropriate policy changes if desired. My only qu

java-common and registry

Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives. Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be possible to include the registry stuff along with it? *flutters eyelids* I can write drafts for the appropriate policy changes if desired. My only q