> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I'm not sure. Any word from the j2se1.3 maintainer(s) on
Ben> this?
Off the top of my head I don't think the JVM itselfinerface has
changed significantly, i.e. the byte codes themselves. The rest of
the Java runtime has changed e
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> I'm not sure. Any word from the j2se1.3 maintainer(s) on
Ben> this?
Off the top of my head I don't think the JVM itselfinerface has
changed significantly, i.e. the byte codes themselves. The rest of
the Java runtime has changed
> > > Well. I have to ask one thing (before adding such things to the
> > > policy). Have the virtual machine changed (in any strange way) or
> > > is it just the runtime environment that really have changed. I skip
> > > all performance parts and just focus on compatibility.
> >
> > Not quite sur
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 09:22, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > The following just entered .../Incoming.
>
> Great! Good work guys!
I cannot agree more!
Egon
> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> The following just entered .../Incoming.
And of course there's already a bug in the packaging. I'll be
overwriting the packages in .../Incoming today prior to the
ftp-masters getting around to installing it (which will tak
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:40:36AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > > What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
> > > thread about this recently and (I believe) general consensus was that
> > > there should be:
> > >
> > > Provides: java2-virtual-machine (or java2-runtime
> > What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
> > thread about this recently and (I believe) general consensus was that
> > there should be:
> >
> > Provides: java2-virtual-machine (or java2-runtime?)
> > Provides: java2-compiler
>
> Well. I have to ask one thing (befor
On Wednesday 19 September 2001 09:22, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > The following just entered .../Incoming.
>
> Great! Good work guys!
I cannot agree more!
Egon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> The following just entered .../Incoming.
And of course there's already a bug in the packaging. I'll be
overwriting the packages in .../Incoming today prior to the
ftp-masters getting around to installing it (which will ta
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 08:40:36AM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > > What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
> > > thread about this recently and (I believe) general consensus was that
> > > there should be:
> > >
> > > Provides: java2-virtual-machine (or java2-runtim
> > What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
> > thread about this recently and (I believe) general consensus was that
> > there should be:
> >
> > Provides: java2-virtual-machine (or java2-runtime?)
> > Provides: java2-compiler
>
> Well. I have to ask one thing (befo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> The following just entered .../Incoming.
I have uploaded a fixed Tomcat package to unstable that works with the
new JAVA_HOME. It also builds using the new j2sdk1.3 packages. I will
update my other Java package within the next few
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> The following just entered .../Incoming.
Great! Good work guys!
Regards,
// Ola
> I'd like to thank Matthias Klose for all his work. He is largely
> responsible for the existence of these packages.
>
> There will be sparc an
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
> The following just entered .../Incoming.
I have uploaded a fixed Tomcat package to unstable that works with the
new JAVA_HOME. It also builds using the new j2sdk1.3 packages. I will
update my other Java package within the next few
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:15:13PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. I checked out the j2se1.3 packages and they look great;
> good work on finally getting them in debian proper. :)
>
> I do have one question, and you're going to hate me for it but I'm going
> to ask it anyway.
>
> What are we d
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:59:10PM -0700, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> The following just entered .../Incoming.
Great! Good work guys!
Regards,
// Ola
> I'd like to thank Matthias Klose for all his work. He is largely
> responsible for the existence of these packages.
>
> There will be sparc a
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:15:13PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. I checked out the j2se1.3 packages and they look great;
> good work on finally getting them in debian proper. :)
>
> I do have one question, and you're going to hate me for it but I'm going
> to ask it anyway.
>
> What are we
Hi. I checked out the j2se1.3 packages and they look great;
good work on finally getting them in debian proper. :)
I do have one question, and you're going to hate me for it but I'm going
to ask it anyway.
What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
thread about this r
Hi. I checked out the j2se1.3 packages and they look great;
good work on finally getting them in debian proper. :)
I do have one question, and you're going to hate me for it but I'm going
to ask it anyway.
What are we doing about the java2 dependency issue? There was a long
thread about this
The following just entered .../Incoming.
I'd like to thank Matthias Klose for all his work. He is largely
responsible for the existence of these packages.
There will be sparc and ppc packages in .../Incoming shortly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:13:
The following just entered .../Incoming.
I'd like to thank Matthias Klose for all his work. He is largely
responsible for the existence of these packages.
There will be sparc and ppc packages in .../Incoming shortly.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:13
21 matches
Mail list logo
