Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I refer to the j2sdk1.4 debian package from blackdown.org. It > has a libc version requirement although it shouldn't. It's a bug. Stephen already said he'll build packages with a lower libc dependency. Juergen -- Juergen Kreileder, Bl

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 22:39 schrieb Glen Mehn: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > >PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew > >where files should be installed... > > try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting ex

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Juergen Kreileder
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, I refer to the j2sdk1.4 debian package from blackdown.org. It > has a libc version requirement although it shouldn't. It's a bug. Stephen already said he'll build packages with a lower libc dependency. Juergen -- Juergen Kreileder, Bl

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 22:39 schrieb Glen Mehn: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > >PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew > >where files should be installed... > > try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting ex

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Glen Mehn
Hendrik Sattler wrote: PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew where files should be installed... try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting executable that you can intsall anywhere

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Glen Mehn
Hendrik Sattler wrote: PS: I looked at the rpm from Sun and I do not think that the creators knew where files should be installed... try using the .bin version-- it's a self-extracting executable that you can intsall anywhere -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Philipp Meier
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:24:38PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey: > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > > > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be > > > > in the /usr or /

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-09 Thread Philipp Meier
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:24:38PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey: > > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > > > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be > > > > in the /usr or /

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey: > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be > > > in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( > > > > I

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Brett Sealey
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in > >the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( > > > I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and > it runs fine. He must have been us

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Max Gilead
Hendrik Sattler wrote: libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and it runs fine. Max

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2002 16:16 schrieb Brett Sealey: > On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be > > > in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( > > > > I

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Brett Sealey
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Max Gilead wrote: > Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > >libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in > >the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( > > > I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and > it runs fine. He must have been us

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-08 Thread Max Gilead
Hendrik Sattler wrote: libc version. However, sun has a really sick idea, where files should be in the /usr or /usr/local tree :-( I don't know about such requirement. I run Sun's JDK from /home tree and it runs fine. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-07 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 7. Dezember 2002 19:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: > So I would like to choose the blackdown packages with switching to ^^^ Hmm, this would have been: without > unstab

j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-07 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I read and saw about the j2sdk-1.4 .deb packages ad blackdown.org. However and for no obvious reason, the packages are only their sid tree and the apt tells me that they require libc 2.3.1. Well, I know that binary java package from java.sun.com

Re: j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-07 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag, 7. Dezember 2002 19:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler: > So I would like to choose the blackdown packages with switching to ^^^ Hmm, this would have been: without > unstab

j2sdk-1.4.x for woody

2002-12-07 Thread Hendrik Sattler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I read and saw about the j2sdk-1.4 .deb packages ad blackdown.org. However and for no obvious reason, the packages are only their sid tree and the apt tells me that they require libc 2.3.1. Well, I know that binary java package from java.sun.com