Re: hamcrest 1.2

2012-03-12 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Brian Thomason wrote: > I just have a general aversion to epochs as they are a permanent > solution to a temporary problem, but if the consensus is that an epoch > is preferred over two binary packages from the same source package, > I'm happy to do it.

Re: hamcrest 1.2

2012-03-12 Thread Brian Thomason
I'll proceed with this tomorrow and also upload the libhamcrest1.2-java package that is already in Ubuntu. Regards, Brian On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On 12/03/2012 22:04, Brian Thomason wrote: >> >> Hello all, > > > Hi Brian, > >

Re: hamcrest 1.2

2012-03-12 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
On 12/03/2012 22:04, Brian Thomason wrote: Hello all, Hi Brian, I uploaded hamcrest 1.2 some time ago in efforts to get the dependency chain of Eucalyptus 3.1 in place which we plan to upload to Debian soon. I was unaware that junit4 still fails to build against anything greater than 1.1

hamcrest 1.2

2012-03-12 Thread Brian Thomason
Hello all, I uploaded hamcrest 1.2 some time ago in efforts to get the dependency chain of Eucalyptus 3.1 in place which we plan to upload to Debian soon. I was unaware that junit4 still fails to build against anything greater than 1.1 - sorry about that! In Ubuntu, I solved the problem by