Re: gij package providing java1-runtime

2004-01-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sablevm recently added "Provides: java1-runtime, java2-runtime"... Grzegorz told me he solved the problem in the next upload of sablevm > leave the gij package as it is. I do agree. -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- pgp0.pgp Descripti

Re: gij package providing java1-runtime

2004-01-31 Thread Ben Burton
> So I suggest the leave the gij package as it is FWIW, I agree with this (my reasons are given in the bug log). Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gij package providing java1-runtime

2004-01-31 Thread Stefan Gybas
Matthias Klose wrote: See #176629: gij-3.2: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime. Is this a somewhat valid report? which runtime implementations provide the complete runtime? I don't know if you've read -java in the past weeks but there's no consensus what java*-runtime actually means and wh

gij package providing java1-runtime

2004-01-31 Thread Matthias Klose
See #176629: gij-3.2: package incorrctly provides java1-runtime. Is this a somewhat valid report? which runtime implementations provide the complete runtime? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]