Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-13 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Torsten, On 05/08/2010 05:40 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java > instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind > 0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against > libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-

Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
On 09/05/10 03:03, Torsten Werner wrote: Hi Eric, On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade. but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least? Yes, please, do. Thanks, Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Eric, On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Once JiBx1.2 is available in Ubuntu, I'll abandon my blockade. but may we remove version 1.0 from the archive at least? Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hello, ergh, sorry but I rolled-back this change as I packaged the next version of FreeMind (0.9.0~rc7, uploaded 2 seconds ago on mentors). Reason: I want the FreeMind package to keep working under Debian and Ubuntu without having to keep 2 sets of patches (or even having to rebuild the pack

future of libjibx*-java

2010-05-08 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, I have updated freemind in our svn repo to work with libjibx1.2-java instead of libjibx1.1-java. I suggest to upload freemind 0.9.0~rc6+dfsg-4 with that change and to file removal requests against libjibx-java (1.0) and libjibx1.1-java. Are there any reasons to keep the old versions of jibx th