Torsten Werner writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Bramer wrote:
>> ! Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
>> ! This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible
>> ! runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture,
>> ! which is ${jre} for ${jre
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 01:28:59PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> > - This make extra load for the translation of this description.
>
> It does and for that reason I'm including debian-i18n in this discussion.
> For the record
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Bramer wrote:
> ! Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
> ! This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible
> ! runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture,
> ! which is ${jre} for ${jre:arch}.
the interesting p
Hello
If you look a the control file from java-common-0.40, you found
something like this:
! Package: default-jre
! Architecture: any
! Depends: default-jre-headless (= ${binary:Version}), ${jre}${jre:version},
! ${misc:Depends}
! Provides: ${jre:provides}
! Description: Standard Java or Java c
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:11:27PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
> - This make extra load for the translation of this description.
It does and for that reason I'm including debian-i18n in this discussion.
For the record I support the idea that dynamic descriptions should be
discouraged unless ther
5 matches
Mail list logo