Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 03/09/2018 à 17:41, Thorsten Glaser a écrit : > GCJ is more portable and can create native executables for > many Java™ programs (though not those doing classloader > magic at runtime, for example) — these two reasons are still > extant, although I have heard GCJ no longer is :| GCJ is indeed

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > I was surprised to know that gnu java which at one point was a > > high-priority project was deprecated within gcc > > When Sun released Java under the GPL and started the OpenJDK project it > lost its raison d'être. One of them. GCJ is more portabl

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-03 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 06:46:00PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > The java-policy package should have a copy of the original document (with no > alterations). It should also include a README file to point contributors to > the > Salsa repository for the java-faw I am a bit confuse

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 03/09/2018, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Package to install is debiandoc-sgml > > > Sent from iPhone > Dear Osamu, I already did mate. See https://salsa.debian.org/shirishag75-guest/java-policy/commits/faqchanges https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/5/diffs?co

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 02/09/2018, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 07:45:47PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> at bottom :- > ... > ... >> I did couple of commits and have put the same as a merge requests at >> https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/1 just >> for compari

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 02/09/2018 à 16:15, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Now while I'm doing the nominal changes am stuck at certain points - > > a. $Revision: 7831 $, $Date: 2013-06-05 21:17:15 +0100 $ > > how is the revision and time-stamp derived. If I were to guess it would be > something to do with moinmoin ? Thi

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
El dom., 2 sept. 2018 18:03, Osamu Aoki escribió: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 07:45:47PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > > at bottom :- > ... > ... > > I did couple of commits and have put the same as a merge requests at > > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/1 just > > for

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 07:45:47PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > at bottom :- ... ... > I did couple of commits and have put the same as a merge requests at > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/java-policy/merge_requests/1 just > for comparison purposes whether it's good or not. > > Quite a few qu

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-02 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 02/09/2018, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 31/08/2018 18:27, shirish शिरीष wrote: > >> 1.2 Location of this FAQ >> >> This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at >> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/. The java-common >> (available at http://packages

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-09-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 31/08/2018 18:27, shirish शिरीष wrote: > 1.2 Location of this FAQ > > This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/. The java-common > (available at http://packages.debian.org/java-common) provides an HTML > version for off

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread shirish शिरीष
Reply in-line :- On 31/08/2018, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: > Hi there, Dear all, > > Why doesn't the Java team actually review the Java FAQ and let DDP know if > it should be kept or dropped completely? (In the latter we should remove it > from the web listing and remove it from java-co

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, Am 31.08.2018 um 19:36 schrieb Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: [...] > I agree too as I wrote most of the content a long time ago (18 years!). > > This is > partly because the people who created the old Debian Java FAQ are no > longer involved in Debian Java or may even have reassigned

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
Hi there, El vie., 31 ago. 2018 19:03, Markus Koschany escribió: > Hello, > > Am 31.08.2018 um 18:27 schrieb shirish शिरीष: > > Dear all, > > > > I was reading > > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ > > > > and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudat

Re: debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, Am 31.08.2018 um 18:27 schrieb shirish शिरीष: > Dear all, > > I was reading > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ > > and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudated info. [...] We have recently started to improve our Java documentation about pa

debian-java-faq seems to be pretty old -

2018-08-31 Thread shirish शिरीष
Dear all, I was reading https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ and it seems the manual is pretty old and seems to have lot of oudated info. For instance just at the beginning itself - 1.2 Location of this FAQ This FAQ is published under the Debian Documentation Project at http://