Bug#833911: RM: findbugs-bcel -- ROM; No longer used, duplicates bcel

2016-08-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Please remove the findbugs-bcel package. It contains an early snapshot of BCEL 6.0 for the needs of the findbugs package, but findbugs now uses the updated BCEL package. findbugs-bcel is no longer used and can be safely removed. Thank you, Emmanuel

Re: bcel-6.0~rc4

2015-09-03 Thread tony mancill
On 09/02/2015 11:42 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 03/09/2015 06:09, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Thoughts? > > I would wait for the final BCEL release, things may change again, and > there is no urge to update BCEL since our version is already compatible > with Java 8.

Re: bcel-6.0~rc4

2015-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 03/09/2015 06:09, tony mancill a écrit : > Thoughts? I would wait for the final BCEL release, things may change again, and there is no urge to update BCEL since our version is already compatible with Java 8. Emmanuel Bourg

bcel-6.0~rc4

2015-09-02 Thread tony mancill
Hi Java Team, I have packaged the latest upstream of bcel and am preparing to upload it to experimental to aid with transitioning its reverse dependencies. The following is from the upstream changelog: > Compatibility with 5.2 > -- > > Binary compatible - No

Bug#757624: bcel: Upgrade to the version 6.0 to support Java 8

2014-08-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Source: bcel Version: 5.2-10 Severity: important User: debian-java@lists.debian.org Usertags: openjdk-8-transition BCEL 5.2 doesn't support Java 8, this causes a build failure on the ha-jdbc and libjibx1.1-java packages with OpenJDK 8. The error looks like this: org.jibx.runtime.JiBXExce

Comments regarding new BCEL package.

2007-01-09 Thread Paul Cager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've packaged the new release (5.2) of BCEL. Would you [debian-java] mind having a look at it to see if it is OK? I've committed the changes in svn (pkg-java/trunk/bcel). URL of dsc: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bcel/

Re: bcel

2005-03-21 Thread Dalibor Topic
Wolfgang Baer gmx.de> writes: > > I don't know if it can't be run with the free runtimes - I will file > a whislist bug against it and ask there what the problem is. Depends on the version. The latest version tries to use NIO locking unless the respective class is removed, and NIO locking does

Re: bcel

2005-03-21 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:21:24 +0100, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Koch wrote: >> Hello all, >> a good day for our Java effort. the bcel package got accepted into >> main. >> This means we can work on some more package

Re: bcel

2005-03-21 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Michael Koch wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:21:24AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: [...] Somehow hsqldb got removed from NEW queue but dont made it into the archive (yet?). I found it on its package site - it is in experimental. And I thought already I would be blind. ;-) http://packages.qa.debi

Re: bcel

2005-03-21 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 11:21:24AM +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Michael Koch wrote: > >Hello all, > >a good day for our Java effort. the bcel package got accepted into main. > >This means we can work on some more packages to move them to main. >

Re: bcel

2005-03-21 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi Michael, Michael Koch wrote: Hello all, a good day for our Java effort. the bcel package got accepted into main. This means we can work on some more packages to move them to main. libmx4j-java comes to my mind which should be directly movable to main and is used by many other packages in

bcel

2005-03-20 Thread Michael Koch
Hello all, a good day for our Java effort. the bcel package got accepted into main. This means we can work on some more packages to move them to main. libmx4j-java comes to my mind which should be directly movable to main and is used by many other packages in contrib. I have changed to edit the