Re: another packaging question

2001-06-25 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 25 June 2001 16:28, Mark Johnson wrote: > Hi All, > > One more: > > 4. Some of the upstream docbook xml packages [1] come with jar files that >extend saxon, xt, and xalan2 processing functionality. (Separately.) > >Should I package these as java "programs", and include wrapper >

Re: another packaging question

2001-06-25 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Monday 25 June 2001 16:28, Mark Johnson wrote: > Hi All, > > One more: > > 4. Some of the upstream docbook xml packages [1] come with jar files that >extend saxon, xt, and xalan2 processing functionality. (Separately.) > >Should I package these as java "programs", and include wrapper >

another packaging question

2001-06-25 Thread Mark Johnson
Hi All, One more: 4. Some of the upstream docbook xml packages [1] come with jar files that extend saxon, xt, and xalan2 processing functionality. (Separately.) Should I package these as java "programs", and include wrapper scripts? Thanks again, Mark [1] The xsl stylesheets, an upc

another packaging question

2001-06-25 Thread Mark Johnson
Hi All, One more: 4. Some of the upstream docbook xml packages [1] come with jar files that extend saxon, xt, and xalan2 processing functionality. (Separately.) Should I package these as java "programs", and include wrapper scripts? Thanks again, Mark [1] The xsl stylesheets, an up