> Bruce, this is a job for you :-)
Maybe when I come home from Alaska. I'd be delighted to see someone else
work on it, too.
Bruce
[debian-legal: please CC: me, I'm not on this list.]
On Wednesday 28 July 1999, at 11 h 24, the keyboard of Stephane Bortzmeyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - A total ban on SCSL code. The license is simply too dangerous to
> > include in the Debian distribution, even under non-free.
>
> C
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 01:51:18PM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> Ok, but you can pick up books that document the Class Libraries and the
> language specification too. I'm sure, sooner, or later, there'll be a Jini
> book too, but I'll forgo that point for now. I simply think that we're
> first
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> > You missed my point though. The section you quote, is from the SCSL, which
> > you read and agree to (either in writing or by clicking on "I accept").
> > You do not have to do either, matter of fact
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> You missed my point though. The section you quote, is from the SCSL, which
> you read and agree to (either in writing or by clicking on "I accept").
> You do not have to do either, matter of fact I doubt the SCSL is anywhere
> in
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:26:41AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> > So would that cover if someone went to Amazon.com and ordered "The Java
> > Virtual Machine Specification", 2cd ed, by Lindholm & Yellin (ISBN
> > 0201432943)
> > and then implement according to that
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:26:41AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> So would that cover if someone went to Amazon.com and ordered "The Java
> Virtual Machine Specification", 2cd ed, by Lindholm & Yellin (ISBN 0201432943)
> and then implement according to that, then you say that Sun claims it as a
>
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> The SCSL is like the GPL, a viral license. The chief difference, however,
> is that the GPL makes everything it touches subject to free redistribution
> and a garauntee of source availability and the SCSL makes everything it
> touches subject to Sun licensing fees. The
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:24:24AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > - A total ban on SCSL code. The license is simply too dangerous to
> > include in the Debian distribution, even under non-free.
>
> Could you elaborate on that?
The SCSL is like the GPL, a viral license. The chief differen
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 8 h 43, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> continue our efforts in the face of the SCSL. I have read the SCSL
> quite carefully and I can tell you that it is utterly incompatible
> with any notion of free software.
OK.
> - A total ban
10 matches
Mail list logo
