Re: Bug#713182: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-10-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel, On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 30/09/2014 16:34, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > > any news about netbeans? > > I gave up trying to fix it, sorry. It really needs a more recent > version. That means you should probably keep the absolutelayout jar in

Re: Bug#713182: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-09-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/09/2014 16:34, Andreas Tille a écrit : > any news about netbeans? I gave up trying to fix it, sorry. It really needs a more recent version. That means you should probably keep the absolutelayout jar in IGV for now. Emmanuel bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.deb

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-09-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, any news about netbeans? Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 09:47:19AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 17/08/2014 11:04, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > > > But now there is another problem with svnkit 1.8.5, if > > someone could look into it I'm not familiar with this libr

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-08-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 17/08/2014 11:04, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > But now there is another problem with svnkit 1.8.5, if > someone could look into it I'm not familiar with this library. I fixed the svnkit issue, now the build breaks on missing com.sun.tools.javac.util classes in Java 7. I'll keep playing the backp

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 16/08/2014 17:45, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > I can take a look, this is a trivial fix. Ant 1.9 added generics to some > method signatures, and this broke a few packages like netbeans and visualvm. I fixed the issue with Ant 1.9, as well as two other issues with Java 7 and mingw32 4.9. But now

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-08-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/08/2014 23:09, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Or is there any work ongoing to fix netbeans? I can take a look, this is a trivial fix. Ant 1.9 added generics to some method signatures, and this broke a few packages like netbeans and visualvm. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-08-16 Thread Andrew Ross
On 15/08/14 22:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. So I wonder whether it makes sense to keep > on depending from netbeans if IGV is full of binary JARs anyway > (unfortunately - that's why it is in non-free). If netbeans remains RC > buggy without anybody caring about it we co

Re: Status of netbeans (... and what to do with igv)

2014-08-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Niels, On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 06:42:15PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-08-14 09:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > > even if I have no idea why according to > > > >https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=igv > > > > igv depends from netbeans (any explanation for this would be interesti

Re: Status of netbeans

2014-08-14 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-08-14 09:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > even if I have no idea why according to > >https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=igv > > igv depends from netbeans (any explanation for this would be interesting > as well) I wonder if anybody might care about this package which is not

Status of netbeans

2014-08-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, even if I have no idea why according to https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=igv igv depends from netbeans (any explanation for this would be interesting as well) I wonder if anybody might care about this package which is not fit for release since over one year without any response (