Re: Section: java

On Tuesday 19 May 2009 20:37:05 Ludovic Claude wrote: > I've seen many packages using Section: java, so I think it's good. FYI, > here's a mail from Joerg Jaspert which was sent earlier: Thanks. It's exactly was I was looking for. On Tuesday 19 May 2009 20:52:52 Benjami

Re: Section: java

Hi Rail! Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 20:07 +0400 schrieb Rail Aliev: > I want to make lintian happier but i've got the following warning: > * W wrong-section-according-to-package-name > o libzemberek-java => java > > As far I understood this message, lintian suggests

Re: Section: java

tion list is not up to date. However, policy states that "The Debian archive maintainers provide the authoritative list of sections". Running aptitude easily allows to verify that there actually is a section "java" with approx. 350 packages. It would make sense to file a bug agains

Section: java

Hi, Could anybody help me with the following situation? I want to make lintian happier but i've got the following warning: * W wrong-section-according-to-package-name o libzemberek-java => java As far I understood this message, lintian suggests to use "Section: java"