Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > * There are several jenkins-* packages that will (presumably) need to >be updated as often as Jenkins itself. I wondered which packages were "jenkins*" and figured it out with the help from Adam: holger@coccia:~$ dak rm -Rn jenkins Wil

Re: Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 23:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: > >> [...] > >> > >> I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. > >> We concluded that it was infeasibl

Proposal to do regular jenkins updates via jessie-updates (Was: Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie)

2015-04-08 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-04-08 22:45, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: >> [...] >> >> I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. >> We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due >> to the lack of upstream comm

Re: Removing Jenkins from Jessie

2015-04-08 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:17:59 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió: > [...] > > I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. > We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due > to the lack of upstream commitment to a LTS release-cycle of sufficient > leng

Removing Jenkins from Jessie

2015-04-08 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, I had a chat with James Page and Emmanuel Bourg about Jenkins over IRC. We concluded that it was infeasible for Debian to maintain Jenkins due to the lack of upstream commitment to a LTS release-cycle of sufficient length to match the length of Jessie[1]. Accordingly, we agreed to remove the