Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I was wondering if this needs to be added somewhere in documentation
> (wiki or policy) or is it ok to go ahead and do the changes to
> packages.
yes :)
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Torsten Werner
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>> doko had mentioned that -gcj packages offer performance improvements
>> on architectures where JIT compiler is not present in JRE.
>
> But nobody is doing Java development today on arc
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> doko had mentioned that -gcj packages offer performance improvements
> on architectures where JIT compiler is not present in JRE.
But nobody is doing Java development today on architectures without a
JIT compiler. The buildds aren't affected
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Ludovic Claude
wrote:
> I never use gcj packages, I'm always unsure whether they will work
> because dynamic class loading is used more and more in Java, and OpenJDK
> is nowadays fast enough at startup to be convenient for command line
> useage. So yes, I support
I never use gcj packages, I'm always unsure whether they will work
because dynamic class loading is used more and more in Java, and OpenJDK
is nowadays fast enough at startup to be convenient for command line
useage. So yes, I support the downgrade from Recommends gcj packages to
Suggests.
Ludovic
Okay... I will try that once more
What I was trying to write (other than my name) was that I support the
downgrade of Recommends to Suggests.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Torsten Werner wrote:
> we've got the following comment in bug #559058 from doko:
>
> "it's current practice/policy to have such a recommendation for the
> corresponding -gcj package. if you want to have this changed, please
> address this on the debian-java ML, and don't change it on a per
> pack
Hi,
we've got the following comment in bug #559058 from doko:
"it's current practice/policy to have such a recommendation for the
corresponding -gcj package. if you want to have this changed, please
address this on the debian-java ML, and don't change it on a per
package basis."
I cannot find a
9 matches
Mail list logo
