Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-22 Thread Stefan Gybas
Matt Price wrote: you'll noticew that the Include line is ocmmented out -- for me, that line didn't do anything, I guess because mod_jk.conf is EMPTY. mod_jk.conf is only generated by Tomcat 3.x (Debian package tomcat), not by Tomcat 4.x (Debian package tomcat4). But this feature will also be rem

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-22 Thread Stefan Gybas
Matt Price wrote: you'll noticew that the Include line is ocmmented out -- for me, that line didn't do anything, I guess because mod_jk.conf is EMPTY. mod_jk.conf is only generated by Tomcat 3.x (Debian package tomcat), not by Tomcat 4.x (Debian package tomcat4). But this feature will also be

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Matt Price
I have to say, I don't really understand this mod_jk stuff. I've read all the available documentation I can find, but none of it resolves my issue. Currently I've managed to make my application work just fine using manual ocnfig of Apache -- so in addition to the LoadModule line I have the follow

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Matt Price
I have to say, I don't really understand this mod_jk stuff. I've read all the available documentation I can find, but none of it resolves my issue. Currently I've managed to make my application work just fine using manual ocnfig of Apache -- so in addition to the LoadModule line I have the follow

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 21 Oct 2002 8:31 pm, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote: > > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at > > all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote: > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at > all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the > apache website for how to do this. Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the approp

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 21 Oct 2002 8:31 pm, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote: > > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at > > all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 20 Oct 2002 8:16 pm, Matt Price wrote: > Hi there, > > I hope this is the right list -- let me know if I should be sending > this to debian-user. > > I have an instance of Tomcat 4.0.4 (the testing package) running on my > almost-all-woody ma

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:35:13PM +0100, Tom Badran wrote: > Out of box, debians tomcat distribution will not integrate with apache at > all, even if you install mod_jk. You need to follow the howto on the > apache website for how to do this. Huh? What is necessary beyond uncommenting the approp

Re: tomcat 4, mod_jk

2002-10-21 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 20 Oct 2002 8:16 pm, Matt Price wrote: > Hi there, > > I hope this is the right list -- let me know if I should be sending > this to debian-user. > > I have an instance of Tomcat 4.0.4 (the testing package) running on my > almost-all-woody ma