Re: rpmbuild issue

2016-08-01 Thread Geert Stappers
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:41:36PM -0700, Austin Shalit wrote: > On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 1/08/2016 à 23:27, Austin Shalit a écrit : > > > >> Yes - RPM version 4.12.0.1 > > > > Does it work better if you use the Oracle JDK instead of the OpenJDK and > > OpenJFX pa

Re: rpmbuild issue

2016-08-01 Thread Austin Shalit
No -- fails the same on both. > On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:30 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 1/08/2016 à 23:27, Austin Shalit a écrit : > >> Yes - RPM version 4.12.0.1 > > Does it work better if you use the Oracle JDK instead of the OpenJDK and > OpenJFX packages in Debian? > signature.asc De

Re: rpmbuild issue

2016-08-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 1/08/2016 à 23:27, Austin Shalit a écrit : > Yes - RPM version 4.12.0.1 Does it work better if you use the Oracle JDK instead of the OpenJDK and OpenJFX packages in Debian?

Re: rpmbuild issue

2016-08-01 Thread Austin Shalit
Hi Emmanuel, Yes - RPM version 4.12.0.1 Thank you, Austin > On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 1/08/2016 à 23:11, Austin Shalit a écrit : > >> I hope this is the correct place to get help. I am having trouble >> building a javafx application into an RPM. Take a look at

Re: rpmbuild issue

2016-08-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 1/08/2016 à 23:11, Austin Shalit a écrit : > I hope this is the correct place to get help. I am having trouble > building a javafx application into an RPM. Take a look at this > stacktrace: http://pastebin.com/u66wH0wj > > It looks like the spec file is never created. Hi Austin, It looks l