Re: pkg-java svn layout

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Fry wrote: >>You are right. And what about moving all the packages in a packages >>directory? >> >>pkg-java/website >>/packages/trunk >> /branches >> /tags > > > Well, I don't personally see a lot being

Re: pkg-java svn layout

> You are right. And what about moving all the packages in a packages > directory? > > pkg-java/website > /packages/trunk > /branches > /tags Well, I don't personally see a lot being gained by that, other than preventing those who check out all the packag

Re: pkg-java svn layout

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Fry wrote: [...] > Actually svn-inject also has a '-l' argument: > >"Layout type. 1 (default) means package/{trunk,tags,branches,...} >scheme, 2 means the {trunk,tags,branches,...}/package scheme. 2 is >not implemented yet." > >

Re: pkg-java svn layout (was: Re: r1980 - /)

> I made some tests with svn-buildpackage and I really like it. The tool > uses the layout (svn-inject -o PACKAGE_VERSION.dsc > svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-java/packages/): > > <...> > > The '-o' argument to svn-inject tells it not to upload upstream tarball > in subversion repository. A