On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
> any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking for it's removal but
> would like to understand what is the deciding factor(s) on whether a
> package should remain in De
On 15/08/2013 13:09, Stephen Nelson wrote:
> I notice this package has a couple of outstanding bugs which I should
> be able to fix. I just want to ask a couple of questions:
>
> The popcon value for this package is low and there do not seem to be
> any packages depending on openjpa. I'm not asking
2 matches
Mail list logo
