Re: openjfx usage in megan-ce

Hi Felix, thanks for your very helpful hints. On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 07:36:42PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > > It seems the CLASS_PATH in debian/rules is not used during build, we > need to patch "build.classpath" in antbuild/build.xml, like this (last > patch): > > --- a/antbuild/build.xml >

Re: openjfx usage in megan-ce

Andreas Tille writes: > Hi Felix, Hello Andreas! > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: >> > I had a first packaging centric look on megan-ce[1]. While there >> > are several problems I stumbled upon several compile errors like >> >> I cannot currently build this beca

Re: openjfx usage in megan-ce

Hi Felix, On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 04:23:31PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote: > > I had a first packaging centric look on megan-ce[1]. While there > > are several problems I stumbled upon several compile errors like > > I cannot currently build this because my libjloda-java is at 0.0+20161018. It is

Re: openjfx usage in megan-ce

hello Andreas, Felix Natter writes: > This simple patch should work: > > diff --git a/debian/manifest b/debian/manifest > index 9b9c713..5b60c58 100644 > --- a/debian/manifest > +++ b/debian/manifest > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > /usr/share/java/megan-ce.jar: > Main-Class: megan-ce.MeganRun > - Class-Pa

Re: openjfx usage in megan-ce

Andreas Tille writes: > Hi, hello Andreas, > I had a first packaging centric look on megan-ce[1]. While there > are several problems I stumbled upon several compile errors like I cannot currently build this because my libjloda-java is at 0.0+20161018. > [javac] > /build/megan-ce-0.0+201