Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2004 01:37 am, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Generate the javadoc! gjdoc has been introduced in kaffe in 1.1.5 and
>> this mail was for release 1.1.4.
>
> Ah! Well, I wasn't going to do the *right* thing. I was going to pregenerate
> the J
Ah! Well, I wasn't going to do the *right* thing. I was going to pregenerate
the Javadoc and just roll it into the package. It would, of course, be better
to regenerate it as part of the build process. That is what you are
suggesting?
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 01:37 am, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Ge
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 02:47 am, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>>
>> > [Ean wrote:]
>> >
>> > I will either merge it back into Kaffe or I will generate Javadoc for
>> > all of the Kaffe classes. That should bring it up above the cutoff
>> > and still repr
Which?
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 02:47 am, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > I will either merge it back into Kaffe or I will generate Javadoc for
> > all of the Kaffe classes. That should bring it up above the cutoff
> > and still represents a useful addition to the package.
>
> How will you do that?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I will either merge it back into Kaffe or I will generate Javadoc for
> all of the Kaffe classes. That should bring it up above the cutoff
> and still represents a useful addition to the package.
How wil
On Monday 05 April 2004 11:49, James Troup wrote:
> a) First of all there are several trivial lintian/linda errors, please
>clean these up before re-uploading.
ACK
> b) Is kaffe-dev really arch: all? Also how come nothing Depends,
>Recommends or even Suggests it?
This package is only fo
6 matches
Mail list logo
