Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-19 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: "E.L. Willighagen (Egon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:26:05 +0200 > > from compiling with free jvm, so junit is gone to contrib. I can write > > swing ui wrapper which prov

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-19 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: "E.L. Willighagen (Egon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 20:26:05 +0200 > > from compiling with free jvm, so junit is gone to contrib. I can write > > swing ui wrapper which prov

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Philipp, * Philipp Meier wrote: >On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:42:06PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote: >> kaffe is something to be investigated :( Anyway it also has motif portions, >> so... >Can't then be the gtk binding of swt be of use? In the moment (not yet in unstable, but I hope soon: www.kat

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Philipp Meier
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:42:06PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote: > Hallo E.L., > > * E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote: > >you considered a SWT drop in? Ah, no, just checked libswt-java is in contrib > >too... so, that won't help... > > I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. Th

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo Philipp, * Philipp Meier wrote: >On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:42:06PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote: >> kaffe is something to be investigated :( Anyway it also has motif portions, >> so... >Can't then be the gtk binding of swt be of use? In the moment (not yet in unstable, but I hope soon: www.kat

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 20:42, Jan Schulz wrote: > I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. The > problem is, that it is build from eclipse source and if that runs under > kaffe is something to be investigated :( Anyway it also has motif portions, > so... Helmer Krämer

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Philipp Meier
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:42:06PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote: > Hallo E.L., > > * E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote: > >you considered a SWT drop in? Ah, no, just checked libswt-java is in contrib > >too... so, that won't help... > > I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. Th

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo E.L., * E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote: >you considered a SWT drop in? Ah, no, just checked libswt-java is in contrib >too... so, that won't help... I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. The problem is, that it is build from eclipse source and if that runs under

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread E.L. Willighagen (Egon)
On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:23, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200 > > > > So it does not depend on any packages outside of main. It is in contrib > > because

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 20:42, Jan Schulz wrote: > I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. The > problem is, that it is build from eclipse source and if that runs under > kaffe is something to be investigated :( Anyway it also has motif portions, > so... Helmer Krämer

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo E.L., * E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote: >you considered a SWT drop in? Ah, no, just checked libswt-java is in contrib >too... so, that won't help... I haven't tested swt with kaffe, but I think that it should work. The problem is, that it is build from eclipse source and if that runs under

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread E.L. Willighagen (Egon)
On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:23, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200 > > > > So it does not depend on any packages outside of main. It is in contrib > > because

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200 > Package: junit > Section: contrib/devel > Version: 3.8.1-3 > Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine > > So it does not depend on any packages outside o

Re: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer

2003-07-18 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: junit-freenet, was Re: Bug#165504 acknowledged by developer Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:23:30 +0200 > Package: junit > Section: contrib/devel > Version: 3.8.1-3 > Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine > > So it does not depend on any packages outside o