"Spectron International, Inc." wrote:
> Are there any plans on making debs of any of the 2 JDK 1.2.2 (Sun,Blackdown)
> and Tomcat (new Jserv, implements Servlets 2.2 and JSP 1.1)?
I don't know about JDK 1.2 but I have posted an ITP (intend to package)
tomcat to debian-devel some time ago. However
> ASR writes:
ASR> I've got the same problem Seems to be a bad detection of
ASR> symlink in java script that is a symlink to .java_wrapper in
ASR> this part of code
No, this code is OK. The bug is with shellutils.
ASR> # Resolve symlinks. See 4152645.
ASR> while [ -h "$
Hello
I've got the same problem
Seems to be a bad detection of symlink in _javascript_ that is a symlink
to .java_wrapper
in this part of code
# Resolve symlinks. See 4152645.
while [ -h "$PRG" ]; do
ls=`/bin/ls -ld "$PRG"`
link=`/usr/bin/expr "$ls" : '.*-> \(.*\)$'`
if /usr/bin/expr
> Louis-David Mitterrand writes:
Louis-David> After doing my daily "apt-get upgrade" on a potato
Louis-David> machine with blackdown java2 now I get:
Louis-David> % /usr/local/jdk1.2/bin/java
Louis-David> Error: can't find libjava.so.
Louis-David> Has anybody got the same
Okay, so there is a lot of dicussion about not being able to
redistribute the jdk1.2 because of facist licensing by Sun. However, this
isn't a unique case, is it? Netscape and realplayer, at least, both have
this *SAME ISSUE*, as well as ezmlm and qmail, I believe. The work around
is an
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:05:00AM -0400, Gene McCulley wrote:
> Mark> Yes, the JDK License is scary. Especially the License that
> Mark> comes with JDK 1.2. Clause 2 of that license says:
>
> >> Software is confidential and copyrighted. Title to Software and
> >> all associa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> Yes, the JDK License is scary. Especially the License that
Mark> comes with JDK 1.2. Clause 2 of that license says:
>> Software is confidential and copyrighted. Title to Sof
Adam Heath, here at Novare, has packaged fastjar. He can either adopt it
or provide it as a nice starting point for somebody else. Either way,
here is a deb.
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 11:53:57PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> P.S. There is a nice little utility that should be included in Debian.
> It
Mark Wielaard Writes:
> Also note that you probably don't want to use JDK 1.2 if you are working on
> any of the free Java implementations. Clause 1 of the Supplemental License
> Terms says:
>
> > [You] may not create, or authorize your licensees to create
> > additional classes, interfaces, or su
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 1999 at 05:12:25PM -0400, Gene McCulley wrote:
>
> I was wondering about whether there were plans to package jdk1.2. I
> thought I would search the mailing list archives before I asked and I
> found this in a mail about release critical bugs:
>
> >> Package: jdk1.1 (non-free
10 matches
Mail list logo
