Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On Sat Aug 08 15:14, Ludovic Claude wrote: > You can see more details about Maven support in my blog post. > http://ludovicc.blogspot.com/2009/08/state-of-maven-in-debian.html > > mh_make relies on a lot of Java code to extract all information from the > Maven POM descriptors and the local Maven r

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Hello Matthew, You can see more details about Maven support in my blog post. http://ludovicc.blogspot.com/2009/08/state-of-maven-in-debian.html mh_make relies on a lot of Java code to extract all information from the Maven POM descriptors and the local Maven repository for Debian, so there's not

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Hi Matthew, On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Does it support building packages with debhelper rather than cdbs? Please see . Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:41:54 +0100, Ludovic Claude a écrit : > > Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. > It uses Maven to build packages, and supports now the generation of > Javadoc packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a > Maven project will try

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:05:11 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > No, this looks wrong, because you cannot enforce this for packages > where the docs are shipped in the same package. You should > use /usr/share/doc/ package>/api, and maybe add a directory /usr/share/doc/ > package>with an api > sym

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On Wed Aug 05 23:41, Ludovic Claude wrote: > Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. It > uses Maven to build packages Does it support building packages with debhelper rather than cdbs? > packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a Maven project > will t

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Matthias, I have just uploaded a new version of maven-debian-helper. It uses Maven to build packages, and supports now the generation of Javadoc packages. There is also a utility, mh_make, which given a Maven project will try to build all the Debian packaging for it. Can you give it a try, it's in

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:05:11PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > >Always put it into /usr/share/doc//api. > > No, this looks wrong, because you cannot enforce this for packages > where the docs are shipped in the same package. You should use > /usr/share/doc//api, and maybe add a directory > /usr

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On 05.08.2009 20:02, Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using t

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On 05.08.2009 18:26, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the pbuilder. and it seems that depending on default-jdk i

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:44PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, > Matthias Klose a écrit : > > > On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > > hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the > > > pbuilder. > > > > > >

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:52:34 +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the > > pbuilder. > > > > and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce > > good documentat

Re: javadoc problem with default-jdk

On 05.08.2009 17:00, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: hello as I am working on my remotetea package, I build it using the pbuilder. and it seems that depending on default-jdk is not enought to produce good documentation with javadoc. Indeed it do not find the documentation for standard classes of