Hi Ola!
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:52:13PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > along with the latest java-common. Since j2sdk/j2re is also not yet
> > installed into the archive (is this going to happen ?) we are
> > currently in a bind with our recent java1/2 policy plans.
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hope all is well!
>
> Well, it seems after all the discussion about our java2 virtual
> packages, etc, the java2-*-dummy packages were rejected from the
> archive:
>
> http://incoming.debi
Hi Colin,
Thanks very much for your feedback and input. :-)
Ola - what do you think ? Should the dummy packages go into
contrib ? I think we still need them so that package
dependancies can be satisfied with and without debianized jdk's.
Cheers,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> What happens now ? According to the URL above, the dummy
> packages can't be installed into 'main' because they can only be
> satisfied by non-free packages - can we install the dummy
> packages into non-free
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:53:39AM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> What happens now ? According to the URL above, the dummy
> packages can't be installed into 'main' because they can only be
> satisfied by non-free packages - can we install the dummy
> packages into non-free
> (Ben, do your scripts totally alleviate these problems ?)
Alas, no. :) The scripts handle choosing the correct JVM at runtime. The
-dummy packages were designed to handle package dependencies which is
quite a separate issue.
Ben.
> (Ben, do your scripts totally alleviate these problems ?)
Alas, no. :) The scripts handle choosing the correct JVM at runtime. The
-dummy packages were designed to handle package dependencies which is
quite a separate issue.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
7 matches
Mail list logo
