Le 2023-02-10 15:01, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
DevRef §6.7.8.2 indicates that using such a suffix for *all* repacked
origtgz is better.
Almost all our packages are repacked, that's pointless and brings
no useful information.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> - Drop the +ds suffix
>>
>> Why? Isn't that traditionally used to show a repack?
>
> I have a preference for clean version numbers. The suffix is useful
> if a version was already packaged and needs to be modified afterward
> because unwanted files we
Le 2023-02-10 01:50, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
- Don't build the -java-doc package, that's useless
Um, why do you say it's useless?
Because with every new Java release we keep getting new javadoc issues
breaking the builds and violating the Debian policies. Considering that
almost nobody use the
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:07:14PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2023-02-09 19:39, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
>
> > Thanks for all your help. I think I managed to figure this out finally.
> > I've put my repo on salsa here:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jackson-modules-java8
> >
> > Anyon
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote:
> Sorry for jumping into the discussion, but it looks like maven-helper
>deploys
> jar files slightly incorrectly.
I think this is an open bug where it’s still under discussion
whether to fix it there or change the java policy instead.
(Your eMail lines
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> The content of the binary package is perfect. Nice trick in debian/control
> to reuse the same description, I didn't know that was possible.
These tricka usually lead to *really* awfully useless .changes files
though, unfortunately.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Hi,
Sorry for jumping into the discussion, but it looks like maven-helper
deploys
jar files slightly incorrectly. It places .jar in /usr/share/java
and
then creates a symlink -.jar to it, rather than place
-.jar and create a symlink .jar. Would it be ok
to
submit a patch for that?
Best Regar
Le 2023-02-09 19:39, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
Thanks for all your help. I think I managed to figure this out finally.
I've put my repo on salsa here:
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jackson-modules-java8
Anyone care to do a(n in-depth) review before I upload?
Great! Here is my review:
- Don'
On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 08:14:35AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2023-02-09 00:24, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
>
> > I see jackson-annotations comes from package
> > libjackson2-annotations-java,
> > and indeed version 2.14.0-1 does not contain a debian symlink for
> > /u/s/maven-repo [0]. Any more
Le 2023-02-09 00:24, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
I see jackson-annotations comes from package
libjackson2-annotations-java,
and indeed version 2.14.0-1 does not contain a debian symlink for
/u/s/maven-repo [0]. Any more ideas?
You are probably missing a substitution rule for jackson-annotations:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 06:03:50PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:51:48AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 2023-02-08 05:47, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
> >
> > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Error resolving version for
> > > plugin 'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plu
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:51:48AM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 2023-02-08 05:47, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
>
> > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Error resolving version for
> > plugin 'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin' from the repositories
> > [local (/usr/share/maven-repo), central
Le 2023-02-08 05:47, Joe Nahmias a écrit :
[ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Error resolving version for
plugin 'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin' from the repositories
[local (/usr/share/maven-repo), central
(https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2)]: Plugin not found in any
plugin reposi
13 matches
Mail list logo
