2014-04-15 17:40 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:09:51PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > >> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why
> > >> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are
> seldomly
> > >> touching Jav
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:09:51PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> >> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why
> >> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are seldomly
> >> touching Java packages strict rules would be simply helpful.
> >
> >
On 04/14/2014 09:14 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/04/2014 09:27, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
>> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why
>> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are seldomly
>> touching Java packages strict rules would be simply
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:14:15PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> I guess there is a lack of consensus to turn this into a policy. That
> sound like an excellent bikeshedding topic that could keep us busy
> during the freeze :)
I think the best strategy is to write a proposal down since we
Le 10/04/2014 09:27, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> So if there are Debian Java team members who have some preference why
> not recommending this in a policy document? For people who are seldomly
> touching Java packages strict rules would be simply helpful.
I guess there is a lack of consensus to tu
> and we drop the package from Debian Med. Or even more simple: Emmanuel,
> if you would need to touch the package anyway just do your changes and
> we ask for removal of Dianes package.
That sounds like a good plan to me.
Maybe when the java-team version is updated in git Emmanuel can ping us
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:40:43AM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > BTW, is there some policy to name Java source packages? I personally
> > prefer the same source name as the binary name (as Diane did).
>
> There is a policy for the name of the binary packages, but nothing for
> the source
Le 10/04/2014 08:00, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> So you will file an RM bug to ftpmaster?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas (who had his share in this issue by sponsering the package)
>
> BTW, is there some policy to name Java source packages? I personally
> prefer the same source name as the b
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:07:50AM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> 2014-04-10 0:30 GMT+02:00 Diane Trout :
>
> > That was my mistake. I wonder why I didn't find the java team package?
> >
> > Is there a way to retract my package in favor of the java teams?
> >
> Hi,
> I packaged it for Java team b
2014-04-10 0:30 GMT+02:00 Diane Trout :
> That was my mistake. I wonder why I didn't find the java team package?
>
> Is there a way to retract my package in favor of the java teams?
>
Hi,
I packaged it for Java team because it was (is) a Java library but I made
it on behalf of the DebianMed team.
That was my mistake. I wonder why I didn't find the java team package?
Is there a way to retract my package in favor of the java teams?
Diane
On Thursday, April 10, 2014 00:13:49 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that cofoja has been packaged twice. There are two source
> packa
11 matches
Mail list logo
