Re: [buildd-tools-devel] [Solved] Re: Building java packages with sbuild.

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:54:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > When I was trying to solve my problem by myself, I looked for “/proc” as a > keyword in the documentation and did not find a hint that not having it > mounted > was a

[Solved] Re: Building java packages with sbuild.

Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > > Are you using sbuild with sudo or schroot ($chroot_mode in > sbuild.conf)? > > If you're using sudo, the chroot setup is entirely down to you, and > you need to make sure /proc, /sys etc. are mounted e.g. in your > fstab. sudo i

Re: Building java packages

Egon Willighagen wrote: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jmol

Re: Building java packages

Egon Willighagen wrote: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/jmo

Re: Building java packages

On Monday 15 January 2001 20:15, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/multi.jar > > > > Should i just disregard these warnings? > > Never having used the debian packaging tools, my guess says that you

Re: Building java packages

* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-o

Re: Building java packages

On Monday 15 January 2001 20:15, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/multi.jar > > > > Should i just disregard these warnings? > > Never having used the debian packaging tools, my guess says that you

Re: Building java packages

* Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 11:12]: > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/vecmath1.1-1.12.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/junit.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-or-script ./usr/share/java/aelfred.jar > W: jmol: executable-not-elf-

Re: building java packages

On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 20 h 51, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I choose to use jikes, I need some class libraries installed. I'm > thinking of packaging classpath-0.01. jikes works fine with kaffe's classes.

Re: building java packages

On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 16 h 2, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. The current scheme where library .jars go into > /usr/share/java/[repository], doesn't seem to take into account > versioning. There is also no mention of versioning in the Java policy for > /usr/s

Re: building java packages

On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 20 h 51, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I choose to use jikes, I need some class libraries installed. I'm > thinking of packaging classpath-0.01. jikes works fine with kaffe's classes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: building java packages

On Tuesday 26 December 2000, at 16 h 2, the keyboard of John Leuner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. The current scheme where library .jars go into > /usr/share/java/[repository], doesn't seem to take into account > versioning. There is also no mention of versioning in the Java policy for > /usr/

Re: building java packages

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 08:51:08PM +, John Leuner wrote: > > java-compiler > > (currently: > > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > > jikes 1.10-6 > > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > > guavac 1.2-2 > > gcj 1:2.95.2-20) > > assuming jdk1.1-dev is the ibm jdk: > > a) are we allowe

Re: building java packages

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 08:51:08PM +, John Leuner wrote: > > java-compiler > > (currently: > > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > > jikes 1.10-6 > > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > > guavac 1.2-2 > > gcj 1:2.95.2-20) > > assuming jdk1.1-dev is the ibm jdk: > > a) are we allow

Re: building java packages

> > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > > problems: > > > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? > > java-compiler > (currently: > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > jikes 1.10-6 > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > guavac 1.2-2 > gcj

Re: building java packages

> > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > > problems: > > > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? > > java-compiler > (currently: > jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 > ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 > jikes 1.10-6 > java-compiler-dummy 0.2 > guavac 1.2-2 > gcj

Re: building java packages

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote: > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > problems: > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? java-compiler (currently: jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 jikes 1.10-6 java-

Re: building java packages

On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:02:12PM +, John Leuner wrote: > I have started building some java .debs and immediately run into some > problems: > > 1. what do I depend on to have a 'javac' installed ? java-compiler (currently: jdk1.1-dev 1.1.8v1-3 ibm-jdk1.1-installer 1.1.8-3 jikes 1.10-6 java