Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-12 Thread Soeren Kalesse
> LoadModule jk_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so > > # The following line is for apacheconfig - DO NOT REMOVE! > JkWorkersFile /etc/tomcat/jk/workers.properties > Include /etc/tomcat/auto/mod_jk.conf > this finally seems to work. Now I can avoid using a static file :-) ThanX mfg Soeren

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-12 Thread Soeren Kalesse
> LoadModule jk_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so > > # The following line is for apacheconfig - DO NOT REMOVE! > JkWorkersFile /etc/tomcat/jk/workers.properties > Include /etc/tomcat/auto/mod_jk.conf > this finally seems to work. Now I can avoid using a static file :-) ThanX mfg Soeren

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-11 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:52AM +0100, Soeren Kalesse wrote: > > I think that only works with Tomcat 3.3. The docs for 3.2 are wrong. Tomcat 3.2 will just ignore that line and generate it's usual mod_jk.conf-audo with '/libexec'. Either upgrade to 3.3 or hand-maintain your own mod_jk.conf fi

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-11 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:52AM +0100, Soeren Kalesse wrote: > > I think that only works with Tomcat 3.3. The docs for 3.2 are wrong. Tomcat 3.2 will just ignore that line and generate it's usual mod_jk.conf-audo with '/libexec'. Either upgrade to 3.3 or hand-maintain your own mod_jk.conf f

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-11 Thread Stefan Gybas
Soeren Kalesse wrote: Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto: Cannot load /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory You should not just put a single include directive in yo

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-11 Thread Stefan Gybas
Soeren Kalesse wrote: > Syntax error on line 8 of /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto: > Cannot load /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: > /etc/apache-ssl/libexec/mod_jk.so: cannot open shared object file: No > such file or directory You should not just put a single include dire

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-09 Thread Soeren Kalesse
> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so > Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so. > > Hmm... I only have the latter file. well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/ The default directory in tomcat's config is libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong. That

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-09 Thread Soeren Kalesse
> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so > Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so. > > Hmm... I only have the latter file. well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/ The default directory in tomcat's config is libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong. Tha

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-09 Thread Guy Geens
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so. Hmm... I only have the latter file. Soeren> It also s

Re: Tomcat 3.2 + mod_jk-auto

2001-12-09 Thread Guy Geens
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so. Hmm... I only have the latter file. Soeren> It also