Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-26 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 02:35:49PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> (With my Java hat on and my Release hat off) >> >> We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and testing. >> However, there is major blocker

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-13 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 09:10:13AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel. It was a > > problem of ugly casts done without taking care of alignement issues. See > > bug #729448 for more detai

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-13 Thread Andrew Haley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/13/2013 12:29 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I have finally been able to fix openjdk-7 on mips and mipsel. It was a > problem of ugly casts done without taking care of alignement issues. See bug > #729448 for more details. > > With the patch fr

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi, On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 02:35:49PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > (With my Java hat on and my Release hat off) > > We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and > testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself > (and its default-* binaries

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote: > > At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on > > these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to > > change in the near future. > > It di

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote: > At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on > these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to > change in the near future. It did build in the past, but I guess nobody was around to fix it as things changed o