Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Tobias
On 14.06.2016 01:13, Markus Koschany wrote: > By adding a comment you > basically signal to the FTP team, guys I am aware that I didn't write > the code myself but I don't think that this is copyrightable, so my > standard license, the GPL-3, applies here. Alright, I added a comment which will hope

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Markus Koschany
On 14.06.2016 00:58, Tobias wrote: [...] >> Not every piece of code is copyrightable, so there might be a chance >> that there is no action required from our side. In any case I suggest to >> add a Comment: section to your main Files: * paragraph. It helps if you >> clarify these comments with a fe

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Tobias
Hi Markus, thanks again for mentoring! On 13.06.2016 21:21, Markus Koschany wrote: > You could list all licenses in one file or, since we > are almost done, just use debian/copyright in your own project which > would make life for other people easier. Makes sense. I'll do this later. > https://g

Re: RFS: stegosuite/0.7.3-1 [ITP]

2016-06-13 Thread Markus Koschany
On 12.06.2016 15:23, Tobias wrote: > Dear Java packagers, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stegosuite". Hi Tobias, Thanks for your update. I had to update the BSD-2-clause license because they mention that parts of their code was taken from the JPEG group. In this case we must quot