> Regarding the dependencies that you set:
> libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.22) (http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0.html) &
> libcairo2-dev (>= 1.10) (http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cairo.html)
> it implies Debian experimental.
Oh right, I forgot about that my bad.
> Anyway, since we are close to Squee
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 12:50 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote:
> > OK. Thanks for the explanation. Could you write this patch ?
> Sure.
>
> The only thing I'm concerned about is that if I wrote the patch then the
> package will build in *experimental* but it will not in *unstable*. The
> API break th
> OK. Thanks for the explanation. Could you write this patch ?
Sure.
The only thing I'm concerned about is that if I wrote the patch then the
package will build in *experimental* but it will not in *unstable*. The
API break that libnotify brings was introduced in the 0.7.0 version.
So here is 2 q
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 19:53 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer wrote:
> >
> > GCC generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c
> > generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c: In function
> > 'Java_org_gnome_notify_NotifyNotification_notify_1notification_1new':
> > generated/binding
> I will sponsor it for you.
Thank you :)
> But for now, it fails to build under Debian experimental (which is
> mandatory due to some dependencies that you set).
>
>
> GCC generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c
> generated/bindings/org/gnome/notify/NotifyNotification.c: In f
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
> > Please commit it. We can always revert it if we are not happy.
> Done.
>
> Do I have to let my package in the debian mentors list or should I
> remove it from there?
I will sponsor it for you.
But for now, it fails to buil
> Please commit it. We can always revert it if we are not happy.
Done.
Do I have to let my package in the debian mentors list or should I
remove it from there?
--
Guillaume Mazoyer - http://www.respawner.fr/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Samstag, den 15.01.2011, 18:07 +0100 schrieb Guillaume Mazoyer:
> > Don't hesitate to join ;)
> I'm in :)
> Can someone please review the patch before I commit it?
I recommend to use wrap-and-sort (from ubuntu-dev-tools in experimental)
to wrap the long Build-Depends in debian/control.
--
Ben
Le samedi 15 janvier 2011 à 18:07 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
> > Don't hesitate to join ;)
> I'm in :)
Welcome!
> Can someone please review the patch before I commit it?
>
Please commit it. We can always revert it if we are not happy.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java
> Don't hesitate to join ;)
I'm in :)
Can someone please review the patch before I commit it?
--
Guillaume Mazoyer - http://www.respawner.fr/
Index: control
===
--- control (révision 13216)
+++ control (copie de travail)
@@ -2,7 +2,7
Le samedi 15 janvier 2011 à 16:45 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
> > Could you commit the modifications in the Debian Java SVN ?
> I don't think that I can because I'm not a member of the pkg-java team.
> Maybe someone of the team can do it?
Don't hesitate to join ;)
(except if you do not want
Hello,
Le samedi 15 janvier 2011 à 16:00 +0100, Guillaume Mazoyer a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.0.18 of the package
> "libjava-gnome-java".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> - libjava-gnome-java - The java-gnome language bindings project (JAR)
> Could you commit the modifications in the Debian Java SVN ?
I don't think that I can because I'm not a member of the pkg-java team.
Maybe someone of the team can do it?
--
Guillaume Mazoyer - http://www.respawner.fr/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
13 matches
Mail list logo
