Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-22 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:39:51AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. > I > cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the > over-zealous upload.

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian >> errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU? > > You should not be fixing lintian warnings  for the sake of it, NMU proc

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Mar 21 23:24, Onkar Shinde wrote: > By the way the changes I did fixed only fixed mostly lintian > errors/warnings. Should that be avoided when doing NMU? You should not be fixing lintian warnings for the sake of it, NMU procedure says "only fix filed bugs". In the case of moving ant to bu

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon >> jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for >> java packaging. I have fixed these problems along wi

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread tony mancill
Uploaded to the archive. Thank you, Tony Onkar Shinde wrote: > While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon > jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for > java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian > errors/warnings and up

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yes, and it's definitely my mistake for sponsoring without checking the bug. I cc:ed Nicolas on the upload and here again. Nicolas, my apologies for the over-zealous upload. Thank you, Tony Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde

Re: RFS: jython 2.2.1-2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Mar 21 17:55, Onkar Shinde wrote: > While working on logkit -> excalibur-logkit migration I stumbled upon > jython package which has few problems as per latest conventions for > java packaging. I have fixed these problems along with some lintian > errors/warnings and uploaded the package to