Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-08-05 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi Niels, Onkar, On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > I will have a look the JavaDoc cleaning thing now... I quickly figured out that that would take me more effort, to properly hook that in the Debian build systems... I did have a look at compiling 1.4.12 which resulted i

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-08-05 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi Niels, Onkar, On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > Personally I have no issues with targetting this for experimental; in > fact I think it makes perfect sense to use experimental for possible > API/ABI issues[1]. Daniel Leidert and I met up in Utrecht along with some 10 oth

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-24 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-05-24 06:25, Onkar Shinde wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Egon Willighagen > wrote: >> [...] >> >> I'm happy to look at a full error report! (Not sure I can get around >> to setting up an environment for building it myself... (I've done it >> in the past, but have to relearn the

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc >> files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I >> didn't pay too much attention to

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Egon Willighagen
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > The issue is that it fails to clean properly - at least some (java)doc > files are not cleaned, but also some non-text files (can't remember - I > didn't pay too much attention to it).  I haven't actually investigated > the failure that deepl

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-05-23 16:07, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> I "just" read the diff between our current version (1.2.10) and the RFS >> version 1.4.9. Actually, thanks you just made me realize that it FTBFS >> when built twice in a row! >

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi Niels, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > I "just" read the diff between our current version (1.2.10) and the RFS > version 1.4.9.  Actually, thanks you just made me realize that it FTBFS > when built twice in a row! Ah, right! Yes, from 1.2 to 1.4 there are API changes..

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-05-23 13:37, Egon Willighagen wrote: > NIels, > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> It seems that some public methods are changing signature and also that >> some public constants are disappearing in this release (compare

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Egon Willighagen
NIels, On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote: > It seems that some public methods are changing signature and also that > some public constants are disappearing in this release (compared to our > current version). Which ones are those? Th

Re: RFS: cdk 1.4.9-1

2012-05-23 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2012-05-19 14:56, Onkar Shinde wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking for sponsorship for cdk 1.4.9-1. The packaging bits have > been updated in pkg-java svn. I have also uploaded new source package > on mentors.d.n > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdk/cdk_1.4.9-1.dsc > > Please note