Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-06 Thread Ricky Clarkson
If you have a package, say, erm, myjavaprogram, and it works with the Sun JVM, IBM JVM, Blackdown and kaffe, but not sablevm, then my interpretation is that the dependencies should look like this: java2-runtime | kaffe and that kaffe and sablevm, because they don't support everything that is in J

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-05 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z wto, 31-08-2004, godz. 07:59, Ricky Clarkson pisze: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:50:54 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, > > "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-09-01 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:04:49 +0200, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that the new IKVM snapshot (from today) has a new JNI provider > which should be at least good enough to get Eclipse 3 starting up. So it > should now be at least as capable as jamvm, gcj/gij or kaffe with > respect

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 04:12, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > Not sure it's a good idea. Given that the "java-virtual-machine" > dependency was created to accomodate the properties shared among > the JVMs and that most of JVMs, in general, is capable of running > JNI code, running a JNI code is

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Ricky Clarkson
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:50:54 +0200, Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, > "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > >

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:12:28 -0400, "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: When Sarge is finally released shouldn't we think about renaming > java-runtime to something like free-java-runtime and java2-runtime to > something like non-f

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-30 Thread Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z pon, 30-08-2004, godz. 18:16, Arnaud Vandyck pisze: > > Here's the question: should ikvm provide > > java-virtual-machine or not? > > I'd like to say yes. So I second it. First let me welcome next free JVM in Debian! :-) And now to the business... Not sure it's a good idea. Given t

Re: Question about java-virtual-machine

2004-08-30 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:01:59 -0500, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I have just uploaded ikvm to incoming. Great! good news! ;-) (I installed it) [...] > it cannot handle classes/jars that link in native code. Is it on the