On 01/22/2015 02:23 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>>
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>>>
>>> How do
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>>> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
>>> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>>
>>How do automated builds factor into that?
>
> I don't thi
>On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
>> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
>
>How do automated builds factor into that?
I don't think it makes any difference. But IANAL, and you'd have to
read
Le 22/01/2015 00:14, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> most of this is ranting, and marketing.
I, for one, welcome our new marketing overlords and their lovely
duke-decorated TCK certificates ;)
http://www.azulsystems.com/sites/default/files/pdf/cert.zulu1.8.0_25-8.4.0.1-x86lx64.deb.pdf
Emmanuel
--
Le 18/01/2015 23:21, Jonathan Yu a écrit :
> I wonder if there's anything that can (or should) be done to address
> Gil's criticisms. I love Debian and would always prefer to install
> things via apt-get from the official repositories rather than
> download/install third-party packages, so it woul
On 01/18/2015 11:21 PM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Awhile back, there was a question on the Mechanical Sympathy mailing list
> (if you haven't heard of it before, it's a group for discussing development
> of high-performance programs, mainly focussing on Java).
>
> Gil Tene (CTO and C
On 01/19/2015 03:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 19/01/15 11:35, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> I've requested an access to the TCK for Java 8 in June to
>> run it on the Debian packages but I haven't heard back from Oracle yet.
>
> I'd ping them again.
this is a problem. I now got access to the TCK f
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
> own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
How do automated builds factor into that?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On 19/01/15 11:35, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've requested an access to the TCK for Java 8 in June to
> run it on the Debian packages but I haven't heard back from Oracle yet.
I'd ping them again.
Andrew.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On 19/01/15 00:20, Paul Wise wrote:
> If there are individuals who have access to the TCK and could
> validate the package and file bugs, that would be great.
That would be against the rules AFAICR: you're supposed to do your
own TCK runs, and not on behalf of someone else.
Andrew.
--
To UNSU
Le 19/01/2015 01:20, Paul Wise a écrit :
> The actual version is 8u40~b09-1, which means Debian revision 1 of
> beta 9 of 8u40. It sounds like he misinterpreted this version. Perhaps
> expanding the b to beta would help here?
'b' stands for 'build' here, not 'beta'. A new OpenJDK build is tagged
Hi Jonathan,
Le 18/01/2015 23:21, Jonathan Yu a écrit :
> I wonder if there's anything that can (or should) be done to address
> Gil's criticisms. I love Debian and would always prefer to install
> things via apt-get from the official repositories rather than
> download/install third-party packag
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> To my knowledge, Zulu is currently the only OpenJDK 8 binary build available
> that is actually fully tested. When I say "actually fully tested", I mean
> that someone actually states that the specific binary package has passed the
> full set o
13 matches
Mail list logo
