On 04/21/2016 09:47 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:03:31AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>>> No, not really. My gut feeling too is, that packing oss-parent is not
>>> required. To me it looks like something in the Debian specific setup of
>>> the maven dependencies of libnet
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:03:31AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> > No, not really. My gut feeling too is, that packing oss-parent is not
> > required. To me it looks like something in the Debian specific setup of
> > the maven dependencies of libnetlib-java is missing, but I do not see
> > what. Y
- Mail original -
> De: "Benjamin Mesing"
> À: "Andreas Tille" , "Debian Java List"
> , "Debian Med Packaging Team"
>
> Envoyé: Mardi 19 Avril 2016 22:29:12
> Objet: Re: Need help to upgrade libnetlib-java p
Hi Andreas,
> > [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-
> > plugin:jar:2.5.2 is missing, no dependency information
> > available
> > and later on
> > [ERROR] Plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin:2.5.2
> > or one of its dependencies could not be
Hi Benjamin,
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 06:21:43PM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> ok, so oss-parent seems to be not in Debian (it is here: https://repo1
> .maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/7/oss-parent-7.pom).
> If it really is required, it need to be packaged.
>
> I tried to remove th
Hi Markus,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> The problem is that some modules build-depend on other modules from the
> same package but libnetlib-java is not a build-dependency and the
> current version in contrib doesn't provide Maven artifacts either.
>
> No
Hi Andreas,
ok, so oss-parent seems to be not in Debian (it is here: https://repo1
.maven.org/maven2/org/sonatype/oss/oss-parent/7/oss-parent-7.pom).
If it really is required, it need to be packaged.
I tried to remove the parent entry from generator/pom, and build
without it. Maybe oss-parent is
Hi Markus,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 10.04.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> >
> > Any other hint? I admit I'm tempted to upload an older version to main
> > (from contrib) since this build issue is blocking the migration of a
> > chain of depende
Hi Benjamin,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:58:09AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> I have downloaded and tried to build libnetlib-java
Thanks for your attempt to help.
> When trying to build I get the error:
> make -f debian/rules binary
> dh binary --buildsystem=maven --with javahelper
>
Am 10.04.2016 um 09:14 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 05:24:10PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libnetlib-java.git
>>
>> sorry I can't get it to work either. I don't understand the error
>> Non-resolvable parent POM for com.github.fommi
Hi,
I have downloaded and tried to build libnetlib-java
When trying to build I get the error:
make -f debian/rules binary
dh binary --buildsystem=maven --with javahelper
dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=maven
dh_update_autotools_config -O--buildsystem=maven
dh_auto_configu
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 05:24:10PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libnetlib-java.git
>
> sorry I can't get it to work either. I don't understand the error
> Non-resolvable parent POM for com.github.fommil.netlib:parent and
> changing the version makes n
Am 05.04.2016 um 13:02 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:10:36PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 05.04.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Andreas Tille:
>> [...]
>>> I admit I made no progress at the time of the mail above and I'm
>>> wondering whether somebody more competent than me might
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:10:36PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 05.04.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> [...]
> > I admit I made no progress at the time of the mail above and I'm
> > wondering whether somebody more competent than me might tackle this.
> > At least the libnetlib-java issu
Am 05.04.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Andreas Tille:
[...]
> I admit I made no progress at the time of the mail above and I'm
> wondering whether somebody more competent than me might tackle this.
> At least the libnetlib-java issue remains. :-(
>
> Any help would be welcome
>
>Andreas.
Hi Andr
Hi Markus,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:14:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 01.02.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi,
> >
> > any idea how to build libnetlib-java with the existing lombok package or
> > how to fix the lombok package that I can build libnetlib-java
> > successfully.
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:14:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I also
> noticed that lombok master fails to build from source (some TABS are
> missing in debian/rules) and I suggest to create a separate branch to
> ensure that master always works.
These stupid tabs were injected by me due
Am 01.02.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> any idea how to build libnetlib-java with the existing lombok package or
> how to fix the lombok package that I can build libnetlib-java
> successfully. I have no idea what might went wrong here.
>
I'm currently working on getting the andr
Hi,
any idea how to build libnetlib-java with the existing lombok package or
how to fix the lombok package that I can build libnetlib-java
successfully. I have no idea what might went wrong here.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:49:53AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Em
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:44:32PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/01/2016 22:32, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > Did I miss some declaration of the version? I decided to keep 1.1
> > since that fits the download version better than 1.2-SNAPSHOT.
>
> I pushed some tweaks, but at
Le 28/01/2016 22:32, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> Did I miss some declaration of the version? I decided to keep 1.1
> since that fits the download version better than 1.2-SNAPSHOT.
I pushed some tweaks, but at this point it's blocked by the missing
artifacts in liblombok-java.
Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:56:34PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/01/2016 20:55, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> > why com.github.fommil.netlib POMs can not be accessed (isn't this
> > in the very same source tree?)
>
> Yes, but not the same version. core/pom.xml refers to the par
Le 28/01/2016 20:55, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> why com.github.fommil.netlib POMs can not be accessed (isn't this
> in the very same source tree?)
Yes, but not the same version. core/pom.xml refers to the parent pom
com.github.fommil.netlib:parent:1.1, but the parent pom.xml has the
version 1.2-SN
23 matches
Mail list logo
