Pierre Métras writes:
> > Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Beside that I recognize the value a Java Developer Guide could have.
>
> > I definitely agree, many thanks Pierre for volunteer :-D
>
> OK, I volunteer but I'll start small, improving the wiki content when I find
> some time.
> Wolfgang Baer wrote:
> [...]
> > Beside that I recognize the value a Java Developer Guide could have.
> I definitely agree, many thanks Pierre for volunteer :-D
OK, I volunteer but I'll start small, improving the wiki content when I find
some time...
Perhaps my thought has been mis-interprete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
> Hope that helps,
A lot, thanks.
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Baer wrote:
[...]
> Beside that I recognize the value a Java Developer Guide could have.
I definitely agree, many thanks Pierre for volunteer :-D
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:28:36PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > Just my 5 cents: the policy about javadoc doesn't say where the javadoc
> > should be registered in doc-base. I would suggest something like
> > Programming/Java, in order to avoid have link
Hi,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Pierre Métras wrote:
>
>>>Hello list,
>
>
> Salut Pierre,
>
>
>>>Having read the new Draft page, read again another time many pages on the
>>>wiki, in the Java FAQ and in the Java Policy, the java-common bugs, I still
>>>stay with the feeling that there is no cle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Métras wrote:
> Hello list,
Salut Pierre,
> Having read the new Draft page, read again another time many pages on the
> wiki, in the Java FAQ and in the Java Policy, the java-common bugs, I still
> stay with the feeling that there is no clea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>>I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft
>>
>>Me too. :-)
>
> Yep.
>
> Just my 5 cents: the policy about javadoc doesn't say where the javadoc
> should be registered in doc-base. I would suggest s
Hello list,
Having read the new Draft page, read again another time many pages on the
wiki, in the Java FAQ and in the Java Policy, the java-common bugs, I still
stay with the feeling that there is no clear roadmap for Java in Debian,
beginning with the Java Policy.
Information is available, h
Hi,
>> I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft
>
> Me too. :-)
Yep.
Just my 5 cents: the policy about javadoc doesn't say where the javadoc
should be registered in doc-base. I would suggest something like
Programming/Java, in order to avoid have links all over the place in dhelp
Hi You,
Sanghyeon Seo wrote:
I just finished reading http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft
Me too. :-)
Some comments:
[Virtual packages]
Please define, what it means to provide a virtual package. From the
context of the document, the only *garantee* this provides makes is "you
can develop java
Andrew Haley writes:
> Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html
>
> This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant
> scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full de
Re debugging info -- I put this patch into ecj on Fedora:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2006-January/msg00086.html
This patch means that no matter what broken debug options are in Ant
scripts, every Java program in an RPM has full debuginfo.
Essentially, this turns a rule
13 matches
Mail list logo
