Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-19 Thread Niels Thykier
Eric Lavarde wrote: > Torsten Werner wrote: >> This is a false positive because the first alternative dep is >> openjdk-6-jre. > Same for libjibx-java... > > Eric > >> >> Cheers, >> Torsten >> I checked the remaining ones and it turned out all of them were false positives, except the one Torsten

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-19 Thread Eric Lavarde
Torsten Werner wrote: This is a false positive because the first alternative dep is openjdk-6-jre. Same for libjibx-java... Eric Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-16 Thread Torsten Werner
replying to debian-java On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > libjgroups-java: >        Varun Hiremath (u) >        Torsten Werner (u) I have uploaded a fixed package. > weka: >        Soeren Sonnenburg (u) >        Torsten Werner (u) This is a false positive because the firs

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-16 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:25:15PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Niels Thykier writes: > >> I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it > >> turns out that we have 7 packages depending on a non-free version of > >>

Re: Java packages in main depending on non-free java.

2009-09-15 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Niels Thykier writes: >> I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it >> turns out that we have 7 packages depending on a non-free version of >> java (as an alternative to a free or a java-runtimeN). > > Eh? I checke