On 08/08/17 14:39, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
Hi,
not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like he
On 07.08.2017 14:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
>>> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a Bo
On 06.08.2017 07:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
>> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if
>> there
>> is interest.
>
> There is only
On 18.07.2017 19:14, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if
> there
> is interest.
There is only adHoc scheduling 24h before. So I'm trying to schedul
On 20/07/17 00:26, tony mancill wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:28:31AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Hi,
not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing suc
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 01:28:31AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> > Hi,
> >
> > not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> > buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if
> > there
> >
Am 19.07.2017 um 01:14 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Hi,
>
> not sure how many people will visit DebConf. Would it make sense to have a
> buster BoF? I'll be there, and would like helping organizing such a BoF if
> there
> is interest.
>
I'll be in Montreal too. Also wanted to bring this topic up m
Although a flat file repo would be sufficient, I believe setting up
something like nexus would be more beneficial. It's relatively straight
forward. They provide an open source version that can be used.
My work doesn't currently work with remote repos, but It should be a simple
change.
Cheers,
A
On 20/08/14 17:46, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Keen readers of the Debconf programme will notice that there's a java
> packaging Bof on Monday morning. I wrote some text when I submitted the
> suggestion, but I don't think we need feel overly constrained by it.
>
> As well as dependency/mav
9 matches
Mail list logo