Re: Java 2

> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Artur" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Artur> Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) Artur> in Debian? Juergen> We have Debian packages for Java2 v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and Juergen> JA

Re: Java 2

> "Juergen" == Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Artur" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Artur> Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) Artur> in Debian? Juergen> We have Debian packages for Java2 v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and Juergen> J

Re: Java 2

> "Artur" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Artur> Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) Artur> in Debian? We have Debian packages for Java2 v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and JAI 1.0.2. The packages will be available from our mirrors (http://www.blackdown.org/mirror.

Re: Java 2

> "Artur" == Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Artur> Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) Artur> in Debian? We have Debian packages for Java2 v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and JAI 1.0.2. The packages will be available from our mirrors (http://www.blackdown.org/mirror

Re: Java 2

On Tuesday 29 August 2000, at 10 h 59, the keyboard of Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why jdk1.1 is in distribution and 1.2 can`t be put in it ? They don't have the same licence.

Re: Java 2

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > Why don`t update java in debian? License? There are non-free section, > > (sun java 1.1 also isn`t free, but it`s included in debian distro). > > There are several ways to be non-free. We do not package Microsoft Word, not > even in non-free, because we don't hav

Re: Java 2

On Friday 18 August 2000, at 9 h 31, the keyboard of Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) in Debian? See the Debian/Java FAQ . > All major distributions (excluding RedHat an

Re: Java 2

On Tuesday 29 August 2000, at 10 h 59, the keyboard of Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why jdk1.1 is in distribution and 1.2 can`t be put in it ? They don't have the same licence. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Re: Java 2

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > Why don`t update java in debian? License? There are non-free section, > > (sun java 1.1 also isn`t free, but it`s included in debian distro). > > There are several ways to be non-free. We do not package Microsoft Word, not > even in non-free, because we don't ha

Re: Java 2

On Friday 18 August 2000, at 9 h 31, the keyboard of Artur Radosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are ther any plans to include latest java VM (1.2 or 1.3) in Debian? See the Debian/Java FAQ . > All major distributions (excluding RedHat an